Originally Posted by Dan McVay
I believe that abortion is a major issue that needs to be discussed with absolute accuracy and honesty. You seem to disagree. I don't think we as a society will ever be able to have a constructive dialogue on abortion as long people take it as their right to be sloppy and avoid the hard work to achieve complete accuracy. Your clock could be fixed with a caveat or by doing extremely hard work. You are choosing to do neither.
I understand that you have strong feelings about abortion. Don't those strong feelings tell you to be absolutely accurate?
No, you don't. You are, in fact, trying to derail/sideline the discussion by calling for a reporting criteria [labled by you as accuracy] that is well outside the norm for scientific, let alone non-scientific (used here to mean accurate reporting of scientific findings by non-scientists/researchers), reporting. Or, do you really believe what you wrote and, in fact, view modern physics as a bunch of hogwash?
To the OP, keep up the good work.