newest posts
|
Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums, the largest Catholic Community on the Web.
Here you can join over 300,000 members from around the world discussing all things Catholic. Membership is open to all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, who seek the Truth with Charity.
To gain full access, you must register for a FREE account. Registered members are able to:
- Submit questions about the faith to experts from Catholic Answers
- Participate in all forum discussions
- Communicate privately with Catholics from around the world
- Plus join a prayer group, read with the Book Club, and much more.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So join our community today!
Have a question about registration or your account log-in? Just contact our Support Hotline.
|

May 16, '12, 12:21 am
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: April 28, 2012
Posts: 192
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Bishop Fellay Talks About the SSPX and Rome (new video)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wasserfall
Truelight, I don't find him vague in this video. However, a couple of times there is a cut in the video that disrupts his line of thought. I would very much prefer to see an unedited video.
|
Here's a comment from Rorate Caeli. I found it interesting!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bill
This is a disturbing video, assuming it has not been edited dishonestly. I have seen Bishop Fellay speak many times (on video), and this is a quite different Bishop Fellay.
H.E. begins by saying that it is wrong to think of SSPX vs Rome. He, himself, has talked in those terms many times. He then talks (very vaguely) about the current crisis in the Church, but does not use the word "crisis" or the word "Modernism." In fact, it sounds like he is embracing the "Spirit of Vatican II" cant, though he does not use that phrase either: "Many people have an understanding of the Council which is a wrong understanding."
The whole video is like that. Whether by Bishop Fellay's intent or by the video editor's intent, the interview comes across as nearly an endorsement of the neoCath position. What would Mark Shea, for example, find objectionable in this video?
Imagine that you wanted the SSPX to split. This is the video you would make. The rational fear that trads have (based on Campos and the FSSP) is that they will be muzzled and then assimilated into the neoCath borg, should they come back to Rome. And, taa daa, here is the (apparently) borg-enhanced, newly neoCath Bishop Fellay reciting the party line. He even claims to have had a kind of conversion experience: "In [the doctrinal] discussions . . . we see that many things we would have condemned as being from the Council are, in fact, not from the Council."
See, if you read the actual documents of VII and ignore the Spirit of VII, you'll see it's not so bad . . .
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search Thread |
|
|
|
| Display |
Threaded Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
advertise with us
|