Originally Posted by AngryAtheist8
No, but I don't see why it would matter.
You're arguing over the male bias with regard to cussing and slang.
How very...Feminist of you
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcrichton
...again, your argument is mute if all you infer is that women would be equal to men if the Church would only allow them to become Priests... that is an impossibility... not because women are not as capable as men but because the Ordination made by God is that of Man: a woman cannot be an alter Christus.
This said, you are still missing the point with hollowood... children learn from the adults around them (today more so from television) and women are being trained to think that they cannot achieve greatness unless they are "the man." This makes women a second rate citizen--unless they acquiesce to becoming pseaudo males in order to receive honor, title, and prestige... conversely, the old definition of weak male went out because homosexuals must be revered and calling a guy a sissy is politically incorrect so hollowood has been teaching that weak males (and females that do not conform to their peers) must be called by the female sex organ... sadly, I do not think that you are the only person that seems to find no offense in this behavior!
Maran atha!
Angel
|
As I just pointed out you're not arguing the point consistently.
Re: If Feminist Christians decide that it’s okay to call the Holy Spirit “Sophia” and use feminine pronouns, then by that same logic….
Threaded Mode
