Originally Posted by ConstantineTG
No, I'm saying that his posts suggest that the teaching is merely about suggesting that receiving both species as a requirement is a heresy. That is not true, there are other qualifiers that form what is condemned and one of the posters here outlined it.
I am a business analyst by profession and writing to communicate things clearly is part of my job. I think the first biggest mistake by thisle here is separating the two sentences as two paragraphs. I don't know if you did not take the paragraph separation into account. But to someone in my profession, that makes a world of difference.
You should probably change your profession then. I was a director of one of the world's biggest investment banks and head of credit risk management for Asia so clarity in communication was vital.
Seems sad that you have drawn us into what our jobs are/were to make a point about something that was clear to everyone else except you.