Ossuary of James
I realise this a dead horse that's probably been beaten into a fine red mist, but I read an article today in a magazine I'm subscribed to (BAR, Biblical Archaeology Review) which claims that the Ossuary of James is vindicated by archaeology and whatever-else-ology and is now to be deemed authentic. I'm not troubled by this so much as I am, I don't know, interested. The article itself was highly speculative and smacked of personal pontification... still, I'd like to hear opinions from fellow Catholics, thoughts, arguments, whatever, concerning this... that is, if your eyes aren't bleeding from reading what I imagine is the umpteenth thread of this nature. (I don't know how to navigate this site effectively, nor, I imagine, does everyone else, hence the proclivity toward repeated themes, so please forgive my repetition of a thread.)
|
Re: Ossuary of James
Linear Mode
