| Outreach Project |
Our web outreach efforts are very effective, reaching millions of people around the globe with the Good News of Jesus Christ.
Please prayerfully consider a sacrificial donation in support of Catholic Answers and its Internet activities. As a token of our appreciation, we have a FREE gift for you.
More info...
|
|
Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums, the largest Catholic Community on the Web.
Here you can join over 150,000 members from around the world discussing all things Catholic. Membership is open to all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, who seek the Truth with Charity.
To gain full access, you must register for a FREE account. After registering you'll be able to:
- Submit questions about the faith to experts from Catholic Answers
- Participate in all forum discussions
- Communicate privately with Catholics from around the world
- Plus join a prayer group, read with the Book Club, and much more.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So join our community today!
Have a question about registration or your account login? Just contact our Support Hotline.
|
 |

Apr 14, '05, 3:41 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: June 22, 2004
Posts: 1,249
Religion: RC
|
|
Why no pope John XX?
I'm familiar with all the urban folklore of Pope Joan being Pope John XX, and I know its all a bunch of burnt incense.
But seriously, why was there no pope John XX? Why did John XXI take that name instead of the 20th?
Josh
|

Apr 14, '05, 3:51 pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 7,556
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Why no pope John XX?
The Catholic Encyclopedia says that he was really John XX, but doesn't explain why he was called XXI. It doesn't mean there is one pope left unaccounted for, I'm sure. But, I don't know who would know why or where you'd find that information. Sorry, that's all I could find.
|

Apr 14, '05, 3:53 pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: February 9, 2005
Posts: 7,945
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Why no pope John XX?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by threej_lc
I'm familiar with all the urban folklore of Pope Joan being Pope John XX, and I know its all a bunch of burnt incense.
But seriously, why was there no pope John XX? Why did John XXI take that name instead of the 20th?
Josh
|
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=9043770
A confusion in the numbering of popes named John after John XIV resulted because Marianus Scotus and other 11th-century historians mistakenly believed that there had been a pope named John between antipope Boniface VII and the true John XV. Therefore they mistakenly numbered the real popes John XV to XIX as John XVI to XX.
__________________
"Let prayer delight thee more than disputations, and the charity which buildeth up more than the knowledge which puffeth up."--St. Robert Bellarmine
|

Apr 14, '05, 3:54 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: June 22, 2004
Posts: 1,249
Religion: RC
|
|
Re: Why no pope John XX?
Yeah, we already looked it up in new advent. John the XXI was really John the XX, but he decided to take the former name. Odd.
|

Apr 14, '05, 3:56 pm
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: June 22, 2004
Posts: 1,249
Religion: RC
|
|
Re: Why no pope John XX?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Genesis315
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=9043770
A confusion in the numbering of popes named John after John XIV resulted because Marianus Scotus and other 11th-century historians mistakenly believed that there had been a pope named John between antipope Boniface VII and the true John XV. Therefore they mistakenly numbered the real popes John XV to XIX as John XVI to XX.
|
Thanks a bunch!
|

Apr 14, '05, 4:21 pm
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: June 2, 2004
Posts: 454
|
|
Re: Why no pope John XX?
After the death of John XV, a relative of the emperor was elected pope as Gregory V. However, powerful poltical forces led by one Crescentius installed a man styled John XVI as pope on the Romans. This naturally provoked Emperor Otto III, who returned to Rome with Pope Gregory. Crescentius was excommunicated and then executed by the Emperor. John XVI had fled but was captured and deposed. As a penalty for being the stooge of Crescentius, he was deprived of his sight and his ears and nose were mutilated. He actually lived on for several years and is believed to have died in a monastery. Later the family of Crescentius gained control of Rome and John XVII was one of the popes elected under their influence. Obviously, it would have been dangerous for John XVII to overlook the unfortunate antipope, John XVI. This confusion also affected the numbering of Popes John XVIII (XIX) and John XIX (XX).
There is also no Pope John XX. When the Portuguese John XXI was elected more than 240 years after John XIX, the confusion stemming from the John XVI situation persisted and John XIX was construed as having been John XX.
__________________
It is hard to believe because it is so hard to obey. (Kierkegaard)
To become deep in history is to cease to be Protestant.
(John Henry Cardinal Newman)
Viva, il Papa! Viva, Pope Benedict XVI!
|
| Thread Tools |
Search Thread |
|
|
|
| Display |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|