newest posts
|
Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums, the largest Catholic Community on the Web.
Here you can join over 300,000 members from around the world discussing all things Catholic. Membership is open to all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, who seek the Truth with Charity.
To gain full access, you must register for a FREE account. Registered members are able to:
- Submit questions about the faith to experts from Catholic Answers
- Participate in all forum discussions
- Communicate privately with Catholics from around the world
- Plus join a prayer group, read with the Book Club, and much more.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So join our community today!
Have a question about registration or your account log-in? Just contact our Support Hotline.
|
 |
|
Jul 21, '12, 2:25 pm
|
 |
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: October 10, 2010
Posts: 907
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: SSPX Recognizes Papal Authority, Hints Discussions Will Continue
Some people who attend SSPX chapels might be sedevacantists, just like some people who attend NO masses are pro-abortion. (exceptions do not prove the rule).
Officially, the SSPX (including +Williamson) are a sedeplenist organization in communion with the Pope.
|
Jul 22, '12, 10:35 am
|
|
Forum Elder
|
|
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Posts: 21,170
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: SSPX Recognizes Papal Authority, Hints Discussions Will Continue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Not Sure
The break between the SSPX and the Pope was after the excommunications under Pope John Paul II.
|
Actually the "break" had been earlier, more like in 1975 when the local bishop of Econe suspended the Archbishop and all the priests he ordained. The fraternity and seminary had been licitly founded under Paul VI.
|
Jul 23, '12, 9:50 am
|
 |
Regular Member
Book Club Member
|
|
Join Date: September 23, 2007
Posts: 2,505
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: SSPX Recognizes Papal Authority, Hints Discussions Will Continue
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimR-OCDS
Then the members of SSPX that argued with me about Pope John Paul II not being a validly elected Pope were lying.
OK I'll accept that. 
Jim |
No you are confusing the opinions of a couple people with the official stance of the group. They have a superior general for a reason.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search Thread |
|
|
|
| Display |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
advertise with us
|
