newest posts
|
Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums, the largest Catholic Community on the Web.
Here you can join over 300,000 members from around the world discussing all things Catholic. Membership is open to all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, who seek the Truth with Charity.
To gain full access, you must register for a FREE account. Registered members are able to:
- Submit questions about the faith to experts from Catholic Answers
- Participate in all forum discussions
- Communicate privately with Catholics from around the world
- Plus join a prayer group, read with the Book Club, and much more.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So join our community today!
Have a question about registration or your account log-in? Just contact our Support Hotline.
|
 |
|

Aug 6, '12, 8:50 am
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
Join Date: December 17, 2004
Posts: 9,407
Religion: Catholic - no buts.
|
|
Re: Going to dances in 1800s
I'm going to hazard a guess that there's some context we don't know about here.
Is it possible that in that day, an unsupervised gathering of young people to dance would only appeal to those interested in what we'd call today "hooking up?" We really take for granted today the amount of freedom of movement that young single people have. In that era, perhaps it was not so much. Did they simply live at home with parents until being married (and perhaps even beyond)?
Before simply mocking the Cure (as Allegra seems to be), perhaps we ought to try to comprehend the context.
|

Aug 6, '12, 9:01 am
|
|
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: October 15, 2011
Posts: 1,292
|
|
Re: Going to dances in 1800s
Quote:
Originally Posted by manualman
I'm going to hazard a guess that there's some context we don't know about here.
Is it possible that in that day, an unsupervised gathering of young people to dance would only appeal to those interested in what we'd call today "hooking up?" We really take for granted today the amount of freedom of movement that young single people have. In that era, perhaps it was not so much. Did they simply live at home with parents until being married (and perhaps even beyond)?
Before simply mocking the Cure (as Allegra seems to be), perhaps we ought to try to comprehend the context.
|
 It's also possible that in the Cure's village, dances were where prostitutes found new customers or perhaps a house of ill-repute held dances. We'd have to know the exact context in which he's writing and his experience with what dances were taking place at that specific time in history, in his location, to really understand what he meant. (That's very important for understanding a lot of what various Saints have said throughout history and also when reading certain passages in the Bible, too.
|

Aug 6, '12, 10:09 am
|
 |
Regular Member
|
|
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Posts: 1,294
Religion: Catholic
|
|
Re: Going to dances in 1800s
I honestly think he was more against what happened after the dance than the dance itself. Honestly even the most innocent of dances can lead to impure thoughts. I do wonder though how John Vianney would feel about catholic and christian groups holding dances, but I think he'd be okay with it as long as it was in the right environment. More than likely the dances in John Vianney's town took place at a tavern and probably had a lot of drinking and prostitution going on.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search Thread |
|
|
|
| Display |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
advertise with us
|