Just how "traditional" can the N.O. be? - Page 8

MeaCulpa · #**106** Oct 27, '04, 8:18 am

And you would probably be correct, Sean.

I have my own definition of what SSPX stands for

Stubborn Schismatics Properly eXcommunicated

bear06 · #**107** Oct 27, '04, 12:58 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean O L

Just a few short comments - but too long to post here; so please go to HERE

Having viewed various correspondence over the past several years between Albert and Shawn McElhinney, and having browsed the two links provided by Albert - I do not presume that anything that I can say will make any difference.

Mr. O, so glad to see you here! Any chance Mr. McElhinney, Vere, Erasmus, Grossklas, etc. will join us? You're desperately needed!

I'd love to see the boards "invaded" by you all!

Sean O L · #**108** Oct 27, '04, 5:26 pm

Quote:

Mr. O, so glad to see you here! Any chance Mr. McElhinney, Vere, Erasmus, Grossklas, etc. will join us? You're desperately needed! I'd love to see the boards "invaded" by you all!

G'day bear06,

Thanks for the greeting. There is so much to do - so much penance to do for our past sins. I know Shawn, Pete and Bill (who with me are all former SSPXers) are very involved in doing what can be done. Dave, of course, has an enormous apologetics web-site.

bear06 · #**109** Oct 27, '04, 6:26 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean O L

G'day bear06,

Thanks for the greeting. There is so much to do - so much penance to do for our past sins. I know Shawn, Pete and Bill (who with me are all former SSPXers) are very involved in doing what can be done. Dave, of course, has an enormous apologetics web-site.

Maybe you could post links to all of their sites. Many of these arguments are contained there. I would post them but I know a couple have changed. I'd actually like to have the updated list since I use them quite often.

Thanks for all of your work!