Catholic FAQ


Latest Threads
newest posts



Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Non-Catholic Religions
 

Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums, the largest Catholic Community on the Web.

Here you can join over 400,000 members from around the world discussing all things Catholic. Membership is open to all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, who seek the Truth with Charity.

To gain full access, you must register for a FREE account. Registered members are able to:
  • Submit questions about the faith to experts from Catholic Answers
  • Participate in all forum discussions
  • Communicate privately with Catholics from around the world
  • Plus join a prayer group, read with the Book Club, and much more.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So join our community today!

Have a question about registration or your account log-in? Just contact our Support Hotline.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search Thread Display
  #1  
Old Dec 29, '04, 8:45 am
AnAtheist AnAtheist is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Posts: 1,557
Religion: ./.
Default To FORMER atheists

I'm interested how former atheists (Carl et al.) have justifed their atheism back then.

You surely had some kind of reasoning for your temporal non-belief. Later on you obviously learned some better arguments or saw some flaws in your reasoning.

Care to provide some details? And please do not concentrate on the better arguments but on the reasons for your former atheism and why they now seem wrong or invalid to you.

Thanks.
__________________
barbarus hic ergo sum, quia non intellegor ulli
  #2  
Old Dec 29, '04, 9:03 am
Lisa N Lisa N is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: August 11, 2004
Posts: 4,707
Religion: In RCIA on my way home
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

No logical reason. My parents were atheists and prevented me from interacting with religious people or learning anything about religion.. They said the Bible was simply a book of myths on par with the Greek and Roman myths. They didn't even acknowledge there was any value in either the poetry or philosophy. They were hostile to religion and thought all religious people were stupid and uneducated. Since I considered myself a pretty smart kid, and my parents were well educated (college profs with PhDs) I thought they were right.


Lisa N
  #3  
Old Dec 29, '04, 1:47 pm
Carl Carl is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 551
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

AnAtheist

I think before I get any deeper into this thread, I'd like to know your definition of "atheist." My definition is one who knows there is no God.

On the face of it, this is ridiculous. How could you know there is no God?

Whereas the agnostic is one who knows the existence of God cannot be proven or disproven. There might be a God.

Once I figured out the intellectual dilemma of the atheist, I stopped calling myself one.
__________________
undefined
Invited or not invited, God is present.
  #4  
Old Dec 29, '04, 1:57 pm
Tlaloc Tlaloc is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: December 23, 2004
Posts: 981
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl
AnAtheist

I think before I get any deeper into this thread, I'd like to know your definition of "atheist." My definition is one who knows there is no God.
Is a Catholic then one who knows there is a God and He is as described by the Catholic church? Why can't an Atheist simply have faith that there is no God?
  #5  
Old Dec 29, '04, 3:14 pm
Carl Carl is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 551
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

Why can't an Atheist simply have faith that there is no God?
__________________


The last time I looked, atheists demand proof for God, not faith. Why shouldn't we demand proof from them of Nogod? Why shouldn't they be held to the same standard they demand of us?
__________________
undefined
Invited or not invited, God is present.
  #6  
Old Dec 29, '04, 3:23 pm
caroljm36 caroljm36 is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2004
Posts: 863
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

All this is about beliefs. It seems obvious to me that an atheist believes there is no God and I don't think he is required to prove the non-existence to call himself an atheist. An agnostic claims to not know one way or the other and just sits on the fence (a rather silly position to maintain throughout a lifetime IMO).
  #7  
Old Dec 29, '04, 3:25 pm
Tlaloc Tlaloc is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: December 23, 2004
Posts: 981
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl
Why can't an Atheist simply have faith that there is no God?
__________________

The last time I looked, atheists demand proof for God, not faith. Why shouldn't we demand proof from them of Nogod? Why shouldn't they be held to the same standard they demand of us?
Well lest see: Atheists may demand proof of God because you are asking them to change beliefs the same as you might want proof of No God if you were to change. Besides which you overgeneralize atheists as all demanding proof which is blatantly untrue. And you top it off by ignoring Occam's Razor that the explanation that is simplest is the most likely and therefor requires the least amount of supporting evidence.
  #8  
Old Dec 29, '04, 4:38 pm
Idisto Idisto is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Posts: 43
Religion: atheist ex-Catholic
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

Very few atheists claim to know there is/are no God/gods. The problem is that the definitions about atheism, agnosticism, and faith are not easily settled. Here's how I understand it:

strong atheism: postive belief that gods do not exist (but not necessarily claimed as certain)

weak atheism: no positive belief that gods do exist (no belief that could even be claimed as certain)

atheism: either weak or strong atheism

agnosticism: claim that belief about gods are impossible to evaluate
  #9  
Old Dec 29, '04, 5:01 pm
Lisa N Lisa N is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: August 11, 2004
Posts: 4,707
Religion: In RCIA on my way home
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tlaloc
And you top it off by ignoring Occam's Razor that the explanation that is simplest is the most likely and therefor requires the least amount of supporting evidence.
Well quite honestly, the SIMPLEST explanation for all of the wonders of this world, is a powerful diety. A far more complicated explanation would be needed to explain why everything that exists is a result of some kind of totally random chance.

Lisa N
  #10  
Old Dec 29, '04, 5:12 pm
Tlaloc Tlaloc is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: December 23, 2004
Posts: 981
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa N
Well quite honestly, the SIMPLEST explanation for all of the wonders of this world, is a powerful diety. A far more complicated explanation would be needed to explain why everything that exists is a result of some kind of totally random chance.

Lisa N
Thats not the way Occam's Razor works. Most of life is quite adequately explained using empirically supported science. Positing some external undectable and yet hugely influential force is far less likely. That doesn't make it untrue but it means if you want to try and proceed in a logical fashion that God requires a substantial amount of proof before it becomes the plausable theory.

This is why religions (rightly) work off of faith rather than logic. They require a sense that there is something beyond what can be directly proven. I happen to agree with that.
  #11  
Old Dec 29, '04, 5:13 pm
Idisto Idisto is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Posts: 43
Religion: atheist ex-Catholic
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa N
Well quite honestly, the SIMPLEST explanation for all of the wonders of this world, is a powerful diety. A far more complicated explanation would be needed to explain why everything that exists is a result of some kind of totally random chance.
We know physical laws exist. They are easily demonstrable. Using only them in an explanation is simpler than positing the existence of a supernatural, spiritual, undetectable deity. You may think it's insufficient to explain the order in the universe, but it's simpler in that it works with what we all know exists instead of something people have disagreed about throughout all of human history.
  #12  
Old Dec 29, '04, 5:21 pm
Lisa N Lisa N is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: August 11, 2004
Posts: 4,707
Religion: In RCIA on my way home
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Idisto
We know physical laws exist. They are easily demonstrable. Using only them in an explanation is simpler than positing the existence of a supernatural, spiritual, undetectable deity. You may think it's insufficient to explain the order in the universe, but it's simpler in that it works with what we all know exists instead of something people have disagreed about throughout all of human history.
Physical laws can explain physical phenomenon. An apple can be counted on to fall down rather than rocket up out of the tree. Physical laws cannot explain such phenomenon as altruism, compassion, kindness, consideration. Physical laws do not explain love (other than perhaps Eros love).

Try again

Lisa N
  #13  
Old Dec 29, '04, 5:44 pm
Tlaloc Tlaloc is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: December 23, 2004
Posts: 981
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa N
Physical laws can explain physical phenomenon. An apple can be counted on to fall down rather than rocket up out of the tree. Physical laws cannot explain such phenomenon as altruism, compassion, kindness, consideration. Physical laws do not explain love (other than perhaps Eros love).

Try again

Lisa N
Those things are simply the byproduct of our sentience and sometimes our instincts. We are instinctually programmed to find babies cute for instance. That instinct is then either amplified or counteracted by the person's personality. Physical laws explain how the brain works and how the brain works explains how complex psychological effects occur.

At least thats the stripped down materialistic argument. Personally I don't buy it but its by far more simple (in the sense of occam's razor) than the existence of some invisible entity.
  #14  
Old Dec 29, '04, 6:45 pm
mkw mkw is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 21, 2004
Posts: 612
Religion: Catholic
Send a message via Yahoo to mkw
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

I did not believe in God for very simple reasons I thought valid at the time.

I could not SEE HIM
I could not HEAR HIM
I could not FEAL HIM

Also, I always heard that God was loving, and I reasoned that if that was so, then why was there evil in the world and why did my dad die at age 19 when I was only 5 months old.

I also kept hearing that if you prayed for something, your prayer would be answered. Well, it wasn't. So I reasoned, NO GOD.

After 41 years of living in the dark, I woke up and found out the error of my thinking. I FOUND GOD...........
__________________
Through Mary to Jesus....Heavens ultimate tag-team-duo
  #15  
Old Dec 29, '04, 7:23 pm
abcdefg abcdefg is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 2,173
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: To FORMER atheists

AnAtheist if you're interested in defending atheism I suggest you read marxism philosophy. it won't convert any theist to atheism/agnosticism but it does can prevent some atheism smugs converting to theism. some of the quote translated by myself:
1.religions were born due to lack of human intelligence. anyone who believe in them is foolish.
2.religions are bound to demise.
3.men created God/god/gods in their image.
4.one can't join the commust party with any religious believes. (this is written in the doctrines of the communist party I guess, not directly in any philosophy book)
5.religions are used by ruling classes to anesthetize the working class.
6.no one in the ruling class truely believes in God
7.anything is relative. (relativism)
8.God and peace can't make working class the ruling class. only through violence("armmed revolution" perhaps is a better translation?) can you overthrow capitalism and gain the freedom

I used to think I'm smart enough not to believe in God. Now I see how foolish I was then.
I'm good at Marxism materialism(though I don't believe in it). I'll be glad to answer any question concerning that
Closed Thread

Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Non-Catholic Religions

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search Thread
Search Thread:

Advanced Search
Display

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Prayer Intentions

Most Active Groups
8454Meet and talk,talk talk
Last by: jenna1983
5143CAF Prayer Warriors Support Group
Last by: UpUpAndAway
4424Devotion to the Sorrowful Mother
Last by: DesertSister62
4037OCD/Scrupulosity Group
Last by: eschator83
3863SOLITUDE
Last by: beth40n2
3734Let's empty Purgatory
Last by: DesertSister62
3318Petitions Before the Blessed Sacrament
Last by: Amiciel
3282Poems and Reflections
Last by: PathWalker
3223Catholic Vegetarians & Vegans
Last by: Rifester
3109For seniors and shut- ins
Last by: RevDrJBTDDPhD



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 4:42 am.

Home RSS Feeds - Home - Archive - Top

Copyright © 2004-2014, Catholic Answers.