Catholic FAQ


Help support Catholic Answers!

Latest Threads
newest posts



Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Ask an Apologist
 

Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums, the largest Catholic Community on the Web.

Here you can join over 400,000 members from around the world discussing all things Catholic. Membership is open to all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, who seek the Truth with Charity.

To gain full access, you must register for a FREE account. Registered members are able to:
  • Submit questions about the faith to experts from Catholic Answers
  • Participate in all forum discussions
  • Communicate privately with Catholics from around the world
  • Plus join a prayer group, read with the Book Club, and much more.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So join our community today!

Have a question about registration or your account log-in? Just contact our Support Hotline.

 
 
Thread Tools Search Thread Display
  #1  
Old Feb 3, '12, 3:01 pm
Shereedoc Shereedoc is offline
Trial Membership
 
Join Date: February 3, 2012
Posts: 2
Religion: not sure
Default What is the difference between an atheist and an agnostic?

hi, I've heard some people say that atheism is a suspension of belief instead of a decision not to believe in God. If thats true whats the difference between that and someone who just doesnt know if they believe in God/gods or not?

Last edited by Matt Fradd; Feb 3, '12 at 3:19 pm.
  #2  
Old Feb 3, '12, 3:16 pm
Matt Fradd Matt Fradd is offline
Catholic Answers Apologist
 
Join Date: December 20, 2011
Posts: 11
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: What is an atheist?

Hi Shereedoc, thanks for the question.

The claim that atheism is not a positive assertion flies in the face of the etymology and contemporary, philosophical definitions of atheism. In redefining atheism to mean a “suspension of belief”, the atheist seemingly un-shoulders his burden of proof and the possibility of having his beliefs critically evaluated.

A quick look at the traditional usage of the term, however, shows this “language game” to be an inconsistent and unproductive one which does not get the atheist off the hook.

The term “atheism” is derived from three Greek words:

- a ="no" or “without”.
- theos = "god”.
- Isma = “ism”, which according to the Cambridge Dictionaries Online is “used to form nouns which describe social, political or religious beliefs (my italics), studies or ways of behaving”

Etymologically, then, atheism is the belief, that there is no God.

Not sure if you’re willing to accept my “biased” interpretation? Fine, perhaps you’ll accept that of the World Book Encyclopedia, which defines Atheism as, “…the belief that God doesn't exist.”

How do philosophical encyclopedias define atheism? Permit me to limit myself to three definitions.

1. “According to the most usual definition, an atheist is a person who maintains that there is no God.” (The Encyclopedia of Philosophy-1967)

2."Atheism is the position that affirms the non-existence of God. It proposes positive disbelief rather than mere suspension of belief." (Concise Routledfe Encyclopedia of Philosophy - 2000)

3." Atheism is the doctrine that there is no god. Some atheists support this claim by arguments but these arguments are usually directed against the Christian concept of God, and are largely irrelevant to other possible gods." (Oxford Companion to Philosophy - 1995)

Redefining “atheism” to mean something less resolute – something unidentifiable with agnosticism (from a- "not" + gnostos "known”), I believe, is a retreat made by atheists in the face of continued failed attempts throughout history to develop a compelling argument against theism.

Even if we grant the distinction between positive atheism – the traditional claim that God does not exist, and negative atheism – the novel interpretation that it is a suspension of belief in God, this does not afford the atheist the luxury of not having his worldview critically evaluated, for as theologian Terry Miethe points out:

“The "negative atheist" ends up denying God's existence just as much as the "positive atheist." For the believer (and in reality) to deny the idea of God is to deny the actual existence of God no matter what language game you want to play. Remember, Hans Kung is quite correct in pointing out that there is also an "atheistic language game" that is not self-justified…We must not-cannot-arbitrarily "define" out of existence vast ranges of reality simply because they do not meet our predetermined definition. It is not good enough to say that I have no idea of God therefore I am denying nothing about "his" actual existence. You must examine all of reality and answer or explain why millions have had what they thought was an adequate idea or concept of God, from great philosophers to the "common folk."

Hope that's a help!

- Matt Fradd
 

Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Ask an Apologist

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search Thread
Search Thread:

Advanced Search
Display

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Prayer Intentions

Most Active Groups
8021Meet and talk,talk talk
Last by: Roddy1234
4816CAF Prayer Warriors Support Group
Last by: 77stanthony77
4284Devotion to the Sorrowful Mother
Last by: johnthebaptist2
4027OCD/Scrupulosity Group
Last by: fencersmother
3809SOLITUDE
Last by: Prairie Rose
3358Let's empty Purgatory
Last by: RJB
3183Catholic Vegetarians & Vegans
Last by: CountrySteve
3145Poems and Reflections
Last by: PathWalker
2958For seniors and shut- ins
Last by: tammany
2677Petitions Before the Blessed Sacrament
Last by: Amiciel



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 1:46 pm.

Home RSS Feeds - Home - Archive - Top

Copyright © 2004-2013, Catholic Answers.