Catholic FAQ


Latest Threads
newest posts



Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Apologetics > Sacred Scripture
 

Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums, the largest Catholic Community on the Web.

Here you can join over 400,000 members from around the world discussing all things Catholic. Membership is open to all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, who seek the Truth with Charity.

To gain full access, you must register for a FREE account. Registered members are able to:
  • Submit questions about the faith to experts from Catholic Answers
  • Participate in all forum discussions
  • Communicate privately with Catholics from around the world
  • Plus join a prayer group, read with the Book Club, and much more.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So join our community today!

Have a question about registration or your account log-in? Just contact our Support Hotline.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search Thread Display
  #1  
Old Feb 16, '12, 11:48 am
Bev17243's Avatar
Bev17243 Bev17243 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2011
Posts: 241
Religion: in RCIA
Default Do you take Bible literally?

It seems like I came across number of people on this forum and in real life who proclaim that many events described in the Bible is just a story that has either never occured(and its just a fairly tale sort of a thing) or has allegorical meaning. So what about about Jesus healing the sick, raising the dead and turning water into wine? Curious to know everyone's opinion but I would think you can't pick and choose and believe that Jesus turned water into wine and raised the dead but not for example that Eziekiel go to heaven or that he saw angels, etc. Right?
__________________
We call a man a bigot or a slave of dogma because he is a thinker who has thought thoroughly and to a definite end.
Gilbert K. Chesterton [/i]


  #2  
Old Feb 16, '12, 12:29 pm
hockeyfan hockeyfan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2011
Posts: 198
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev17243 View Post
It seems like I came across number of people on this forum and in real life who proclaim that many events described in the Bible is just a story that has either never occured(and its just a fairly tale sort of a thing) or has allegorical meaning. So what about about Jesus healing the sick, raising the dead and turning water into wine? Curious to know everyone's opinion but I would think you can't pick and choose and believe that Jesus turned water into wine and raised the dead but not for example that Eziekiel go to heaven or that he saw angels, etc. Right?
It is complicated. Not all of the books of the Bible are written historically. Some of them were written in a Apocalyptic style, some prophetic, and some historical. Most of the New Testament was written historically. When you get into the Gospels, the allegory mostly rests in the parables where Jesus would say things like "the Kingdom of Heaven is like..."

A lot of the more allegorical things can be spotted in the writing styles and the historical documents of the time. The creation story, for example, happens twice in the Bible. Both can not be true, because they contradict themselves. Read Genesis 1:1-2:4 and then read Genesis 2:5-25. If you read them closely, they contradict. You can also look at the fact that stories like Noah's Arc already exist in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Outside of Genesis there are other stories that are more prophetic/allegorical like in Daniel.

Sorry I can't go too much into depth, it is a very involved matter.
  #3  
Old Feb 16, '12, 12:34 pm
DCNBILL's Avatar
DCNBILL DCNBILL is offline
Regular Member
Greeter
 
Join Date: December 18, 2009
Posts: 5,493
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

I have yet to see a person who claims to take everything in the Bible literally and have one of their eyes or hands missing.

__________________
Let us offer each other the sign of peace,

bill

My Blog http://thespiritspeakstous.wordpress.com/
  #4  
Old Feb 16, '12, 12:37 pm
Marianna_Mills Marianna_Mills is offline
Trial Membership
 
Join Date: February 6, 2012
Posts: 47
Religion: Converting Roman Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

I believe everything in the bible and take it literally because that is how God wrote it.
  #5  
Old Feb 16, '12, 12:40 pm
Lochias Lochias is offline
 
Join Date: June 10, 2011
Posts: 4,121
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marianna_Mills View Post
I believe everything in the bible and take it literally because that is how God wrote it.
Can you explain what you mean by "God wrote it?"
  #6  
Old Feb 16, '12, 12:41 pm
Marianna_Mills Marianna_Mills is offline
Trial Membership
 
Join Date: February 6, 2012
Posts: 47
Religion: Converting Roman Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lochias View Post
Can you explain what you mean by "God wrote it?"
God wrote it through his people.
  #7  
Old Feb 16, '12, 12:44 pm
Belloc Fan Belloc Fan is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2008
Posts: 747
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev17243 View Post
It seems like I came across number of people on this forum and in real life who proclaim that many events described in the Bible is just a story that has either never occured(and its just a fairly tale sort of a thing) or has allegorical meaning. So what about about Jesus healing the sick, raising the dead and turning water into wine? Curious to know everyone's opinion but I would think you can't pick and choose and believe that Jesus turned water into wine and raised the dead but not for example that Eziekiel go to heaven or that he saw angels, etc. Right?
The Bible isn't a Book. It's a collection of Books, and these Books employ a variety of literary styles: some are historical, some aren't. For example, the entire Book of Song of Songs is an extended metaphor for the relationship between Christ and the Church. Taking it at face value, it would be a pretty weird candidate to include in the canon.

Nobody takes every part of the Bible literally. William Lane Craig gives the example of Psalm 98:8, "Let the rivers clap their hands, let the mountains sing together for joy." Presumably, no sane person thinks that the Psalmist is literally suggesting that the rivers have hands that they clap. He's using an image to suggest that Creation rightly gives praise to God, the Creator.

Likewise, the Prodigal Son (Lk. 15:11-32) is understood by Christians to be an allegory. This is true, even though Jesus begins: "There was a man who had two sons" (Lk. 15:11). We don't take that literally, because the context suggests it's a parable told for its message, rather than its historicity.

In fact, in at least one instance, people go wrong by taking Jesus overly literally: look at John 2:19-21 and Mt. 26:60-63. On the other hand, taking the historical parts as simple allegory is dangerous, too: look at what St. Paul says in 1 Cor. 15:12-19.

So it's important to understand which parts of Scripture are meant to be understood for their historicity, and which are using non-literal styles. All of the Bible is true, but there are ways of expressing truth through parables, poetry, and the like, rather than simply straightforward history.
__________________
1 Peter 4:8 Above all hold unfailing your love for one another, since love covers a multitude of sins.
  #8  
Old Feb 16, '12, 12:45 pm
Inkwell Inkwell is offline
Trial Membership
 
Join Date: February 15, 2012
Posts: 19
Religion: Universalist
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

The Bible is inspirational to me. It doesn't seem like God truly wants us to cut off our hands feet when they scandalize us- it is an allegory. It is a code of life, telling you how you should do everything from raise children to wage war to certain private activities- which is why I respect the word of the Bible so much- it gets down and dirty with us and doesn't pretend there aren't some unsavoury things in the world. But I don't take some bits the Bible literally- rather, I don't take the parts of the Old Testament literally. As important as it is, there are some things that I think aren't meant to be taken literally- for example, the constant reference to sacrificing animals sounds repulsive to me- why would a creator want us to offer dead things to him? I think it's about taking the characteristic of that animal- a dove, perhaps representing care and/or purity, and bringing it to the fore. That's just one thing though. However, I do take the gospels as historical fact-minus Jesus' legendary parables- and the letters from Paul to various communities very seriously, and I believe that Revelations and its signal of hope to be true- if perhaps also allegorical. But I am unwavering in my belief that it is through the Bible we will find completeness with God.
  #9  
Old Feb 16, '12, 12:52 pm
Della Della is offline
Forum Master
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 14,867
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

Quote:
The senses of Scripture
115 According to an ancient tradition, one can distinguish between two senses of Scripture: the literal and the spiritual, the latter being subdivided into the allegorical, moral and anagogical senses. The profound concordance of the four senses guarantees all its richness to the living reading of Scripture in the Church.
116 The literal sense is the meaning conveyed by the words of Scripture and discovered by exegesis, following the rules of sound interpretation: "All other senses of Sacred Scripture are based on the literal."83
117 The spiritual sense. Thanks to the unity of God's plan, not only the text of Scripture but also the realities and events about which it speaks can be signs.
1. The allegorical sense. We can acquire a more profound understanding of events by recognizing their significance in Christ; thus the crossing of the Red Sea is a sign or type of Christ's victory and also of Christian Baptism.84
2. The moral sense. The events reported in Scripture ought to lead us to act justly. As St. Paul says, they were written "for our instruction".85
3. The anagogical sense (Greek: anagoge, "leading"). We can view realities and events in terms of their eternal significance, leading us toward our true homeland: thus the Church on earth is a sign of the heavenly Jerusalem.86
118 A medieval couplet summarizes the significance of the four senses:
The Letter speaks of deeds; Allegory to faith;
The Moral how to act; Anagogy our destiny.87

119 "It is the task of exegetes to work, according to these rules, towards a better understanding and explanation of the meaning of Sacred Scripture in order that their research may help the Church to form a firmer judgment. For, of course, all that has been said about the manner of interpreting Scripture is ultimately subject to the judgment of the Church which exercises the divinely conferred commission and ministry of watching over and interpreting the Word of God."88
But I would not believe in the Gospel, had not the authority of the Catholic Church already moved me.89
The Bible is a collection of writings, not a single book written in only one style and with only one purpose. Each author conveyed something about God to us, but each in his own way and to certain persons and for various reasons. This is why the Bible needs an inspired interpreter, which is what Jesus gave us in the Church when he commissioned the Apostles to teach and preach in his name. For instance, the NT is the written accounts of Jesus' life and mission, a brief history of the very early Church, the instructions and admonitions of the Apostles, with the singular visionary work of St. John in Revelation. We can see the imprint of each author's personality, mission, charism, etc. in what he wrote.

But, in a nutshell, the Catholic Church holds that the Bible is inspired of the Holy Spirit and so reliable in all it tells us about God and the human condition.

It's history is trustworthy and it cannot be written off as mere fairy tales, which is very different from writing in the mythological form. Mythology, as it is truly understood, tells us eternal truths using the language of symbolism. However, most of the Bible is not written in the mythological style, but as plain history, poetry, biography (told not for biographical information only or necessarily as we moderns would write it), prose, etc. The Bible is a rich cultural and historical book, but it's much more, as well.

We Catholics embrace all that the Bible is, and do not employ it to prove anything for it is a witness to the work of God among men not a proof-text for doctrines/dogmas, although all that the Church teaches is upheld in Scripture or finds its origins in it. I hope that helps.
__________________
The external deserts in the world are growing, because the internal deserts have become so vast. -- Pope Benedict XVI

Tiber Swim Team, Class of '87.

Inklings!

"Sanctum erit, facere bonum" Della's blog: http://dellakmg.blogspot.com/
  #10  
Old Feb 16, '12, 12:55 pm
Marianna_Mills Marianna_Mills is offline
Trial Membership
 
Join Date: February 6, 2012
Posts: 47
Religion: Converting Roman Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Della View Post
From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:



The Bible is a collection of writings, not a single book written in only one style and with only one purpose. Each author conveyed something about God to us, but each in his own way and to certain persons and for various reasons. This is why the Bible needs an inspired interpreter, which is what Jesus gave us in the Church when he commissioned the Apostles to teach and preach in his name. For instance, the NT is the written accounts of Jesus' life and mission, a brief history of the very early Church, the instructions and admonitions of the Apostles, with the singular visionary work of St. John in Revelation. We can see the imprint of each author's personality, mission, charism, etc. in what he wrote.

But, in a nutshell, the Catholic Church holds that the Bible is inspired of the Holy Spirit and so reliable in all it tells us about God and the human condition.

It's history is trustworthy and it cannot be written off as mere fairy tales, which is very different from writing in the mythological form. Mythology, as it is truly understood, tells us eternal truths using the language of symbolism. However, most of the Bible is not written in the mythological style, but as plain history, poetry, biography (told not for biographical information only or necessarily as we moderns would write it), prose, etc. The Bible is a rich cultural and historical book, but it's much more, as well.

We Catholics embrace all that the Bible is, and do not employ it to prove anything for it is a witness to the work of God among men not a proof-text for doctrines/dogmas, although all that the Church teaches is upheld in Scripture or finds its origins in it. I hope that helps.
I agree with this completely!
  #11  
Old Feb 16, '12, 1:15 pm
Bev17243's Avatar
Bev17243 Bev17243 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2011
Posts: 241
Religion: in RCIA
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Della View Post
From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:



The Bible is a collection of writings, not a single book written in only one style and with only one purpose. Each author conveyed something about God to us, but each in his own way and to certain persons and for various reasons. This is why the Bible needs an inspired interpreter, which is what Jesus gave us in the Church when he commissioned the Apostles to teach and preach in his name. For instance, the NT is the written accounts of Jesus' life and mission, a brief history of the very early Church, the instructions and admonitions of the Apostles, with the singular visionary work of St. John in Revelation. We can see the imprint of each author's personality, mission, charism, etc. in what he wrote.

But, in a nutshell, the Catholic Church holds that the Bible is inspired of the Holy Spirit and so reliable in all it tells us about God and the human condition.

It's history is trustworthy and it cannot be written off as mere fairy tales, which is very different from writing in the mythological form. Mythology, as it is truly understood, tells us eternal truths using the language of symbolism. However, most of the Bible is not written in the mythological style, but as plain history, poetry, biography (told not for biographical information only or necessarily as we moderns would write it), prose, etc. The Bible is a rich cultural and historical book, but it's much more, as well.

We Catholics embrace all that the Bible is, and do not employ it to prove anything for it is a witness to the work of God among men not a proof-text for doctrines/dogmas, although all that the Church teaches is upheld in Scripture or finds its origins in it. I hope that helps.
thanks for the post, i think you explained it rather well.
__________________
We call a man a bigot or a slave of dogma because he is a thinker who has thought thoroughly and to a definite end.
Gilbert K. Chesterton [/i]


  #12  
Old Feb 16, '12, 1:17 pm
Della Della is offline
Forum Master
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 14,867
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev17243 View Post
thanks for the post, i think you explained it rather well.
You're welcome. It's hard to cover such a subject in a few words. I hope you find it hepful as you learn more about the Church.
__________________
The external deserts in the world are growing, because the internal deserts have become so vast. -- Pope Benedict XVI

Tiber Swim Team, Class of '87.

Inklings!

"Sanctum erit, facere bonum" Della's blog: http://dellakmg.blogspot.com/
  #13  
Old Feb 16, '12, 1:18 pm
TraditonRules TraditonRules is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: January 19, 2012
Posts: 264
Religion: Tryin to come home.
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

I keep searching and asking for explict not allusions in regards to scripture on purgatory
  #14  
Old Feb 16, '12, 1:26 pm
TimothyH TimothyH is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: March 26, 2010
Posts: 9,569
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TraditonRules View Post
I keep searching and asking for explict not allusions in regards to scripture on purgatory
It is not explicit.


-Tim-
__________________
The beginning of the way, at the end of which you will find yourself completely carried away with love for Jesus, is a trusting love for Mary.
- St. Josemaria Escriva

I Ripped My Pants
  #15  
Old Feb 16, '12, 1:42 pm
Della Della is offline
Forum Master
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 14,867
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Do you take Bible literally?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimothyH View Post
It is not explicit.


-Tim-
Nor does it need to be. That's the important point. The Bible is NOT a proof text for doctrine/dogmas. It is one part of Sacred Tradition, which is what our faith is derived from. The Bible is NOT the sum total of the faith nor was it ever meant to be. Our Protestant brethren think so, but there is no evidence for believing it in the Bible itself or the Early Church Fathers.
__________________
The external deserts in the world are growing, because the internal deserts have become so vast. -- Pope Benedict XVI

Tiber Swim Team, Class of '87.

Inklings!

"Sanctum erit, facere bonum" Della's blog: http://dellakmg.blogspot.com/
Closed Thread

Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Apologetics > Sacred Scripture

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search Thread
Search Thread:

Advanced Search
Display

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Prayer Intentions

Most Active Groups
8569Meet and talk,talk talk
Last by: Kellyreneeomara
5241CAF Prayer Warriors Support Group
Last by: UpUpAndAway
4436Devotion to the Sorrowful Mother
Last by: DesertSister62
4037OCD/Scrupulosity Group
Last by: eschator83
3893Let's empty Purgatory
Last by: RJB
3875SOLITUDE
Last by: beth40n2
3459Petitions Before the Blessed Sacrament
Last by: Amiciel
3318Poems and Reflections
Last by: PathWalker
3237Catholic Vegetarians & Vegans
Last by: 4elise
3170For seniors and shut- ins
Last by: flower lady



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 2:27 pm.

Home RSS Feeds - Home - Archive - Top

Copyright © 2004-2014, Catholic Answers.