Joe Arpaio: Barack Obama birth proof 'may be forged' - Page 30

**ProVobis** · #**436** Mar 31, '12, 8:21 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7 Sorrows

we are 42 pages into this thread. why should i have to list facts for you when you clearly don't have any interest in what the investigation finds? it would be a waste of my time.

You can always change your option to 100 posts per page. Just a suggestion.

oldcelt · #**437** Mar 31, '12, 8:49 pm

Quote:

sorry, but your arguments are getting weaker and weaker.

I have made no arguments...I provided analysis of the issue. Believe what you will....you are only making yourself look foolish.

John

7 Sorrows · #**438** Mar 31, '12, 10:11 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldcelt

I have made no arguments...I provided analysis of the issue. Believe what you will....you are only making yourself look foolish.

John

you sure enjoy spending a lot of time reading and responding to a poster who you feel is foolish! sorry the topic of this thread is not to your liking, and you and other posters have the need to bully anyone who doesn't agree with you. you are the ones who look foolish.

oldcelt · #**439** Mar 31, '12, 11:23 pm

Quote:

you sure enjoy spending a lot of time reading and responding to a poster who you feel is foolish! sorry the topic of this thread is not to your liking, and you and other posters have the need to bully anyone who doesn't agree with you. you are the ones who look foolish.

I spend very little time, and I bully no one....I simply do not like nonsense.....BTW, compare my number of posts, on all topics and concede that this topic is, and should be, over.

John

seekerz · #**440** Apr 1, '12, 10:51 am

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldcelt

I spend very little time, and I bully no one....I simply do not like nonsense.....BTW, compare my number of posts, on all topics and concede that this topic is, and should be, over.

John

Amen to that.

**Robert Bay** · #**441** Apr 1, '12, 1:22 pm

MODERATOR NOTICE

This thread is OPEN, if a member doesn't like the topic, please go to other posts. I will start giving infractions and suspensions to members who continue to discredit any other members interest in a topic or have taken upon themselves to moderate the forums.

Rich Olszewski · #**442** Apr 2, '12, 9:16 am

We have IMO two strong-willed and resistant to argument positions, that which believes that Arpaio possesses The Truth and that which considers Arpaio's position nonsense. I see no middle ground at all, no compromise possible, and therefore no reason for me to make any comment on the topic henceforth. That I categorize myself in the latter camp is of no consequence. This is a topic where "round and round the mulberry bush" will always be the tune. TTFN from me on this topic.

7 Sorrows · #**443** Apr 2, '12, 9:27 am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Olszewski

We have IMO two strong-willed and resistant to argument positions, that which believes that Arpaio possesses The Truth and that which considers Arpaio's position nonsense. I see no middle ground at all, no compromise possible, and therefore no reason for me to make any comment on the topic henceforth. That I categorize myself in the latter camp is of no consequence. This is a topic where "round and round the mulberry bush" will always be the tune. TTFN from me on this topic.

for me, i don't say that arpaio has the truth 100%, but my opinion is that i am open to seeing what the team concludes with the investigation, which is not finished. in other words, let's lay the cards on the table and see what we've got. i don't think his investigation is nonsense. for some, there is definitely no middle ground. i am keeping an open mind.

seekerz · #**444** Apr 2, '12, 10:45 am

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7 Sorrows

for me, i don't say that arpaio has the truth 100%, but my opinion is that i am open to seeing what the team concludes with the investigation, which is not finished. in other words, let's lay the cards on the table and see what we've got. i don't think his investigation is nonsense. for some, there is definitely no middle ground. i am keeping an open mind.

That's your prerogative. I simply question the need to make headlines with a conclusion when the investigation is not over. If nothing is proven will he apologize to the president or will the use of the word "may", be a shield against criticism?

ManOnFire · #**445** Apr 25, '12, 8:47 am

What the hell is going on?

"Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, agreed with arguments that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.

"The image of Obama's 1961 Certificate of Live Birth is a rank digital hoax which was never intended by counterfeiters to serve as legal evidence of his eligibility, according to Obama defense attorney Alexandra Hill. Her argument implies that it was only intended to bolster political support as a "barely" believable facsimile of his actual birth record. Therefore, Hill argued, it is inadmissible as authentic evidence of Obama's ineligibility because it is satirical."

This is my favorite part "it is inadmissible as authentic evidence of Obama's ineligibility because it is (such a ridiculous fake that no reasonable person would have taken it seriously in the first place)."

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012...rgery-but.html

**JharekCarnelian** · #**446** Apr 25, '12, 9:00 am

A perfectly reasonable statement by the lady.