Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamus L
Phillip
I don't know how you can suggest that Latinized Easterners as you call them, are incapable of authenically bearing witness to the Gospel ? That's a really strong statement there. Think of all the people that would cover and it includes some who may one day be Saints.
|
Perhaps you are correct. But in my experience those who inquire into Eastern Catholicism, whether they be curious Roman Catholics or Orthodox, are more often than not scandalized by the extensive Latinizations that are commonly encountered. The Orthodox see such extensive Latinization as reflective of their future should reunion with Rome ever take place, and they are rightly disgusted by it. Such Latinization then becomes just one more cause to maintain the current separation, and it has been pointed out by numerous people more knowledgeable and much holier than I that this separation is an impediment to the proclamation of the Gospel.
The issue of Latinized saints is also a touchy subject when it comes to Catholic-Orthodox relations. Just look at the uproar that is caused among some Orthodox when you even mention the name "St. Josaphat."
In this sense Latinization is not only a barrier to (re)union, but also an impediment to evangelization, sentiments that were echoed by Met. Sheptytsky, Kyr Elias Zoghby, Kyr Joseph Raya, Sayedna Joseph Tawil, and the current head of the Eparchy of Newton, Sayedna Nicholas Samra.