Originally Posted by ejp123
I agree with the virtues associated with sex. The way that particular comment was worded was sounding like we just need the working parts for compatibility. That to me is reducing it to mechanical action. It says to me, we don't need the virtues, it's just a deed, the parts work. which is not the case. and by the way get rid of the "you" statements, it is very off-putting. and never did i say that sex amounts to mind blowing orgasms and pleasure. Don't assume.
I'm sorry, ejp. I thought about that after I posted it, that it might come across a bit aggressive, but by that time it was too late to go back and change it. So my apologies. I know you didn't say that, but the wording of your original post made it sound like that was a major concern. What else do you mean by "not sexually compatible"? The way I see it, so long as the anatomy and the virtues are in place (which should be determined before marriage ever takes place), the rest is superfluous. Properly virtuous couples should be able to accomodate for the needs and deficiencies of the other. I suppose I'm just not understanding you clearly, and I apologize for making such personal remarks.