Ann Coulter "Jokes" That a Supreme Court Justice Should Be Poisoned

[bones_IV]

Originally Posted by mlchance

Ah, the joys of selective liberal outrage.

Where were the liberals' condemnations when Randi Rhodes "joked" on two separate occasions about President Bush being assassinated? When Harry Belafonte called the President a terrorist and Nazi thug? When Julianne Malveaux hoped Justice Thomas would die of a heart attack? Name-calling, slander, and expressed hopes for untimely deaths are SOP for the left wing. Just visit here or here for examples ad nauseum.

If it weren't for double standards, those who oppose President Bush and his supporters wouldn't have any standards at all. But, I guess, when trying to protect a woman's "right" to kill her unborn child, everything goes.






-- Mark L. Chance.

P.S. Ann Coulter's remarks about Justice Stevens were in extremely poor taste.

These liberals are just living in denial. They'll die a terrible death.

[dwc]

There are SC justices who we think have a political agenda and poor judicial reasoning, but we don't call for them to be poisoned, or in the case of Pat Robertson, pray for "vacancies."

Here's my problem with Ann Coulter -- I can't get past her shock jock rhetoric to the substance of her argument. She's flippant about very serious subjects and to me, this detracts from her credibility. I ignore her. Yes, many liberals say equally provoking (not thought provoking, just provoking) things, and I tune them out, too. If someone wants to address important issues and be taken seriously, then make serious and worthy arguments. Don't think I'm going to pay attention to your position just because you say outrageous things and follow it up with, "I'm only joking." Blech.

[Seamus]

Originally Posted by dwc

Here's my problem with Ann Coulter -- I can't get past her shock jock rhetoric to the substance of her argument. She's flippant about very serious subjects and to me, this detracts from her credibility. I ignore her. Yes, many liberals say equally provoking (not thought provoking, just provoking) things, and I tune them out, too. If someone wants to address important issues and be taken seriously, then make serious and worthy arguments. Don't think I'm going to pay attention to your position just because you say outrageous things and follow it up with, "I'm only joking." Blech.

Duly noted. We will, hereafter, ignore your opinions.

[dwc]

Duly noted. We will, hereafter, ignore your opinions.

And what is your basis for this personal attack? I haven't been flippant about serious topics and I haven't posted a shocking remark followed by "just joking." I pm'd you to give you an opportunity to air any grievance with me without resorting to snide little one liners in a thread.

[josephdavid]

What is the issue here? She is a political hack who capitolizes on the current media trend of new-conservative chatter.

If anyone who has read her works or heard her speak she caters to the elitists who are wealthy and care not for the poor and environment we live in.