Latest Threads
newest posts

Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Ask an Apologist

Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums, the largest Catholic Community on the Web.

Here you can join over 400,000 members from around the world discussing all things Catholic. Membership is open to all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, who seek the Truth with Charity.

To gain full access, you must register for a FREE account. Registered members are able to:
  • Submit questions about the faith to experts from Catholic Answers
  • Participate in all forum discussions
  • Communicate privately with Catholics from around the world
  • Plus join a prayer group, read with the Book Club, and much more.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So join our community today!

Have a question about registration or your account log-in? Just contact our Support Hotline.

Thread Tools Search Thread Display
Old Dec 21, '06, 3:32 pm
steppenwolf1218 steppenwolf1218 is offline
New Member
Join Date: September 6, 2006
Posts: 91
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Did Mary suffer labor pains?

With the movie The Nativity Story, a lot of questions have been raised over it. While the Vatican hailed the movie, there are those conservatives who maintain the movie is theologically incorrect. One of the points these types harp on is that Mary did not undergo labor pains. I was always under the impression that the Church really has no definitive stance on this issue, that it is unnecessarry one way or the other, however since people often ask me my opinion about such things I want to be sure my response is within Church teachings. So my question is, Does the Church have a stance on this issue?

Last edited by Michelle Arnold; Dec 22, '06 at 1:35 pm.
Old Dec 22, '06, 1:39 pm
Michelle Arnold's Avatar
Michelle Arnold Michelle Arnold is offline
Catholic Answers Apologist
Join Date: May 3, 2004
Posts: 5,123
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Did Mary suffer labor pains?

Recommended reading:

Did Mary suffer in childbirth?

Please also see Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma (p. 205), which states the following:

The dogma [of Mary's perpetual virginity] merely asserts the factof Mary's physical virginity without determining more closely how this is to be physiologically explained. In general the Fathers and the Schoolmen [i.e., the Scholastics, such as St. Thomas Aquinas] conceived it as non-injury to the hymen, and accordingly taught that Mary gave birth in miraculous fashion without opening of the womb and injury to the hymen, and consequently also without pains (cf. ST III:28:2).

However, according to modern natural scientific knowledge, the purely physical side of virginity consists in the non-fulfillment of the sex act ... and in the non-contact of the female egg by the male seed.... Thus, injury to the hymen in birth does not destroy virginity, while, on the other hand, its rupture seems to belong to complete natural motherhood. It follows from this that from the concept of virginity alone the miraculous character of the process of birth cannot be inferred, if it cannot be and must not be derived from other facts of [divine] revelation. Holy writ attests Mary's active role in the act of birth (Matt. 1:25, Luke 2:7: "She brought forth") which does not seem to indicate a miraculous process.

But the Fathers, with few exceptions, vouch for the miraculous character of the birth. However, the question is whether in doing so they attest a truth of [divine] revelation or whether they wrongly interpret a truth of revelation, that is, Mary's virginity, from an inadequate natural scientific point of view. It seems hardly possible to demonstrate that the dignity of the Son of God or the dignity of the Mother of God demands a miraculous birth.
Ott's work was first published in 1952 and it was given an English-language imprimatur in 1954. It is currently being published by TAN Books and Publishers.

At this point, the opinion of churchmen such as St. Thomas Aquinas on the issue remains an opinion. The theological opinion of the Fathers and Scholastics on the issue is, of course, quite valuable and important to the discussion; but it is also important to accurately classify the authority with which they have spoken. All that has been dogmatically defined at this point is that "Mary bore her Son without any violation of her virginal integrity" (Ott, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, p. 205).

Last edited by Michelle Arnold; Dec 27, '06 at 1:44 pm.

Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Ask an Apologist


Thread Tools Search Thread
Search Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Prayer Intentions

Most Active Groups
6604CAF Prayer Warriors Support Group
Last by: tawny
6147Let's empty Purgatory
Last by: hazcompat
5166Petitions Before the Blessed Sacrament
Last by: grateful_child
4628Devotion to the Sorrowful Mother
Last by: neweggs
4289Poems and Reflections
Last by: PathWalker
4055OCD/Scrupulosity Group
Last by: Fischli
3290For seniors and shut- ins
Last by: GLam8833
3261Catholic Vegetarians & Vegans
Last by: Herculees
2824Let's Empty Purgatory 2
Last by: TheCrabNebula
Last by: beth40n2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 5:18 pm.

Home RSS Feeds - Home - Archive - Top

Copyright © 2004-2014, Catholic Answers.