Latest Threads
newest posts



Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Traditional Catholicism
 

Welcome to Catholic Answers Forums, the largest Catholic Community on the Web.

Here you can join over 400,000 members from around the world discussing all things Catholic. Membership is open to all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, who seek the Truth with Charity.

To gain full access, you must register for a FREE account. Registered members are able to:
  • Submit questions about the faith to experts from Catholic Answers
  • Participate in all forum discussions
  • Communicate privately with Catholics from around the world
  • Plus join a prayer group, read with the Book Club, and much more.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So join our community today!

Have a question about registration or your account log-in? Just contact our Support Hotline.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search Thread Display
  #1  
Old May 30, '10, 4:18 pm
Brian777 Brian777 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 5, 2008
Posts: 316
Religion: Catholic
Default Invincible ignorance/material heresy

i found this quote from pope pius x...

Pope Pius X, Acerbo Nimis, 15 April 1905, Paragraphs 2, 26 >
"And so Our Predecessor, Benedict XIV, had just cause to write: 'We declare that a great number of those who are condemned to eternal punishment suffer that everlasting calamity because of ignorance of those mysteries of faith which must be known and believed in order to be numbered among the elect.' (...) These truths, indeed, far surpass the natural understanding of the people, yet must be known by all - the uneducated and the cultured - in order that they may arrive at eternal happiness."

how does this hold with the ideas of Inv. Ign. and material heresy? as it says in Lumen gentium, those who through no fault of their own know not the faith are not culpable for eternal punishment, but here, both Holy fathers seem quite adamant that those souls are in fact damned because of their ignorance.
needless to say i am confused, as St Francis Xavier also told the Asians when they asked him if there was a way to save the departed souls of their pagan ancestors who passed on before the missionaries came that "Alas there is none..." or something very close to that
__________________
Gloria Patri et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto, sicut et erat in principio et nunc et semper et in saecula saeculorum. Amen
  #2  
Old May 30, '10, 4:27 pm
rwoehmke rwoehmke is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 21, 2004
Posts: 4,280
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

So, are we pitting an Encyclical against the teaching of an Ecumenical Council? Why and to whom was the Encyclical written? Just what mysteries are being referred to? Diffucult to draw conclusions without more information.
__________________
The Lord has been good to me. Blessed be the Lord forever.
  #3  
Old May 30, '10, 7:53 pm
ravenonthecross ravenonthecross is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: September 10, 2006
Posts: 164
Religion: The One True Holy Apostolic Catholic Church
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

A General council was solely and purely pastoral in nature; neither putting forth any dogmatic nor doctrinal issues, definitions, or anathematising of error.

The Council declare itself non-binding in matters of dogmata and doctrine; ergo, who are we to presume that, contrariwise to the intial premise that Bl. John XXIII summoned the council upon, a course continued by Pope Paul VI, that such has changed? Most especially when neither Pontiff, nor has any pontiff decreed to the contrary up till this very day; and even still today remaining: none have retracted or revoked this basic premise whereupon the General Council of Vatican II operated.
  #4  
Old May 30, '10, 8:00 pm
Brian777 Brian777 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 5, 2008
Posts: 316
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravenonthecross View Post
A General council was solely and purely pastoral in nature; neither putting forth any dogmatic nor doctrinal issues, definitions, or anathematising of error.

The Council declare itself non-binding in matters of dogmata and doctrine; ergo, who are we to presume that, contrariwise to the intial premise that Bl. John XXIII summoned the council upon, a course continued by Pope Paul VI, that such has changed? Most especially when neither Pontiff, nor has any pontiff decreed to the contrary up till this very day; and even still today remaining: none have retracted or revoked this basic premise whereupon the General Council of Vatican II operated.

right so what does tthat say about the statements from earlier popes?
__________________
Gloria Patri et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto, sicut et erat in principio et nunc et semper et in saecula saeculorum. Amen
  #5  
Old May 30, '10, 11:35 pm
diggerdomer diggerdomer is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: March 16, 2009
Posts: 6,056
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravenonthecross View Post
A General council was solely and purely pastoral in nature; neither putting forth any dogmatic nor doctrinal issues, definitions, or anathematising of error.

The Council declare itself non-binding in matters of dogmata and doctrine; ergo, who are we to presume that, contrariwise to the intial premise that Bl. John XXIII summoned the council upon, a course continued by Pope Paul VI, that such has changed? Most especially when neither Pontiff, nor has any pontiff decreed to the contrary up till this very day; and even still today remaining: none have retracted or revoked this basic premise whereupon the General Council of Vatican II operated.
An ecumenical council is objectively a higher teaching authority than an encyclical.
  #6  
Old May 31, '10, 12:13 am
DavidJoseph DavidJoseph is offline
Regular Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2004
Posts: 501
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravenonthecross View Post
A General council was solely and purely pastoral in nature; neither putting forth any dogmatic nor doctrinal issues, definitions, or anathematising of error.

The Council declare itself non-binding in matters of dogmata and doctrine; ergo, who are we to presume that, contrariwise to the intial premise that Bl. John XXIII summoned the council upon, a course continued by Pope Paul VI, that such has changed? Most especially when neither Pontiff, nor has any pontiff decreed to the contrary up till this very day; and even still today remaining: none have retracted or revoked this basic premise whereupon the General Council of Vatican II operated.
Vatican II has NEVER declared itself to be non-binding. Popes Paul VI and Benedict XVI make that abundantly clear.
Paul VI said the following:

Quote:
You cannot invoke the distinction between dogmatic and pastoral in order to accept certain texts of the Council and to refute others. Certainly, all that was said in the Council does not demand an assent of the same nature; only that which is affirmed as an object of faith or truth attached to the faith, by definitive acts, require an assent of faith. But the rest is also a part of the solemn magisterium of the Church to which all faithful must make a confident reception and a sincere application (Letter to Archbishop Lefebvre, Nov. 10, 1976).


And Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, before he became pope, said the following in "The Ratzinger Report":

Quote:
It is ... impossible to decide in favor of Trent and Vatican I, but against Vatican II. Whoever denies Vatican II denies the authority that upholds the other two councils and thereby detaches them from their foundation. And this applies to the so-called "traditionalism," also in its extreme forms ... Every partisan choice destroys the whole (the very history of the Church) which can exist only as an indivisible unity (28-29).
Quote:
There is no "pre" or "post" conciliar Church; there is but one, unique Church that walks the path toward the Lord, ever deepening and ever better understanding the treasure of faith that he himself has entrusted to her. There are no leaps in this history, there are no fractures, and there is no break in continuity . . . (35).
  #7  
Old May 31, '10, 6:09 am
Brian777 Brian777 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 5, 2008
Posts: 316
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by diggerdomer View Post
An ecumenical council is objectively a higher teaching authority than an encyclical.
how so? both have the infallibility mark, one from the pope himself, the other from the college of bishops gathered together. It would actually seem that they may be equal in authority in some sense. and even if not, the question still remains how to reconcile the statements from earlier popes with SEEMINGLY contradictory statements from the Holy Council
__________________
Gloria Patri et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto, sicut et erat in principio et nunc et semper et in saecula saeculorum. Amen
  #8  
Old May 31, '10, 6:20 am
AnneElliot AnneElliot is offline
Regular Member
Prayer Warrior
Book Club Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2009
Posts: 656
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

There is no problem here. Lumen Gentium states that a person who is ignorant MAY be saved, because "whatever good or truth is found amongst them is looked upon by the Church as a PREPARATION for the Gospel" and then goes on to speak of the importance of the Church's missionary activity "to PROCURE the SALVATION" of them. (cf. Lumen Genium #16).

Ignorance will not save anyone at the Last Judgment.
__________________
"Either die or conquer... There must be no reserve in love." St. Margaret Mary Alacoque
  #9  
Old May 31, '10, 6:26 am
Ahimsa Ahimsa is offline
 
Join Date: September 4, 2004
Posts: 5,977
Religion: Jesus Buddhist
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravenonthecross View Post
A General council was solely and purely pastoral in nature; neither putting forth any dogmatic nor doctrinal issues, definitions, or anathematising of error.

The Council declare itself non-binding in matters of dogmata and doctrine....
Then why would a Council write on doctrine?
  #10  
Old May 31, '10, 6:29 am
Ahimsa Ahimsa is offline
 
Join Date: September 4, 2004
Posts: 5,977
Religion: Jesus Buddhist
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnneElliot View Post
There is no problem here. Lumen Gentium states that a person who is ignorant MAY be saved....
What this implies, is that a Hindu, who dies a Hindu, may be saved.

Quote:
Ignorance will not save anyone at the Last Judgment.
You just contradicted yourself. If "ignorance will not save", then a Hindu, who dies a Hindu, will not be saved.
  #11  
Old May 31, '10, 6:40 am
AnneElliot AnneElliot is offline
Regular Member
Prayer Warrior
Book Club Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2009
Posts: 656
Religion: Roman Catholic
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahimsa View Post
What this implies, is that a Hindu, who dies a Hindu, may be saved.
No, it does not.

A Hindu, ignorant of the Catholic religion, who is open to the Truth, may be saved by accepting the faith a missionary offers him, and being received into the Church through Baptism... to procure his salvation.

You cannot divorce bits a pieces of Lumen Gentium from each other, especially those in the same paragraph!

Quote:
If "ignorance will not save", then a Hindu, who dies a Hindu, will not be saved.
This is correct. A Hindu who dies a Hindu will not be saved. He must die a baptized Catholic.

That does not contradict what I typed above.
__________________
"Either die or conquer... There must be no reserve in love." St. Margaret Mary Alacoque
  #12  
Old May 31, '10, 7:03 am
Ahimsa Ahimsa is offline
 
Join Date: September 4, 2004
Posts: 5,977
Religion: Jesus Buddhist
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnneElliot View Post
A Hindu, ignorant of the Catholic religion, who is open to the Truth, may be saved by accepting the faith a missionary offers him, and being received into the Church through Baptism... to procure his salvation.
In other words, such a Hindu is no longer a Hindu, but a Catholic. So, what you're saying is, "A Catholic may be saved", which is something we've known all along.

I doubt Lumen Gentium was referring to this-life-Catholics when it said: "Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience."

Let me clarify, also, that the issue of contention is whether someone may die a Hindu, and yet be saved (by accepting Christ, after death). The issue of contention is not whether someone can be saved without accepting Christ.

  #13  
Old May 31, '10, 7:04 am
chypmonk's Avatar
chypmonk chypmonk is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: April 27, 2010
Posts: 363
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Anne Elliot is correct there is only a contradiction if you accept the erroneous belief that Vatican II change the way someone is saved.

The thing Vatican II is explaining is NOT that one can be saved without belief in Christ but if they are of good will they will be saved by responding to the graces given, ie eventually entrance into the Faith/Church which can not happen without knowledge of those things necessary for belief to be saved.

This thread has illustrated what EENSers have been saying for years. liberals have changed the understanding of how a person is saved. Liberals say people can be saved without believing in Jesus Christ. There is NO basis to believe anyone since Pentecost as been saved without believing in Jesus Christ Lord and savior and the Holy Trinity--NONE.

So the problem is not these two documents but a liberal bias.
  #14  
Old May 31, '10, 7:11 am
chypmonk's Avatar
chypmonk chypmonk is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: April 27, 2010
Posts: 363
Religion: Catholic
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahimsa View Post
In other words, such a Hindu is no longer a Hindu, but a Catholic. So, what you're saying is, "A Catholic may be saved", which is something we've known all along.

I doubt Lumen Gentium was referring to Catholics when it said: "Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience."
Do Hindus worship false gods? yes

Do Catholics worship false gods ? no

So HOW can a Hindu be Catholic?

Unless you reject the Law of Non- Contradiction (a round-square is a contradiction ie. not true). Hindus reject logic in theology but Catholic don't
  #15  
Old May 31, '10, 7:17 am
Ahimsa Ahimsa is offline
 
Join Date: September 4, 2004
Posts: 5,977
Religion: Jesus Buddhist
Default Re: Invincible ignorance/material heresy

Quote:
Originally Posted by chypmonk View Post
Do Hindus worship false gods? yes

Do Catholics worship false gods ? no

So HOW can a Hindu be Catholic?
A Hindu can become Catholic by accepting the faith.

But Lumen Gentium is referring to those Hindus who, because of conscience, remain Hindus, and L.G. says that even those Hindus may be saved.
Closed Thread

Go Back   Catholic Answers Forums > Forums > Traditional Catholicism

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search Thread
Search Thread:

Advanced Search
Display

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Prayer Intentions

Most Active Groups
6597CAF Prayer Warriors Support Group
Last by: tawny
6138Let's empty Purgatory
Last by: RJB
5162Petitions Before the Blessed Sacrament
Last by: grateful_child
4627Devotion to the Sorrowful Mother
Last by: neweggs
4287Poems and Reflections
Last by: Purgatory Pete
4053OCD/Scrupulosity Group
Last by: Fischli
3290For seniors and shut- ins
Last by: GLam8833
3261Catholic Vegetarians & Vegans
Last by: Herculees
2822Let's Empty Purgatory 2
Last by: tawny
2448SOLITUDE
Last by: beth40n2



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 7:22 am.

Home RSS Feeds - Home - Archive - Top

Copyright © 2004-2014, Catholic Answers.