It's not news to anybody on CAF that the "marriage equality" argument has been as effective for its backers as the "woman's right to choose" argument has been for the abortionists.
But it has an equally fatal weakness as an argument. Like "choice" it relies on distracting people away from what the issue really IS rather than taking an honest and rational look at the issue itself.
The revelation I had yesterday is that the promoters of "gay marriage" (as they call it) are desperately trying to get people to NOT notice what is inside the package, but to by sympathetic to people in a tough spot instead. What don't they want you to notice? The fact that a legal redefinition of marriage that can encompass two men MUST necessarily (if implicitly) include the rejection that marriage has any innate relationship to making babies.
Let that sink in for a second.
If two individual who, by their very nature, have a sterile relationship must be considered "married" in the same way that a man and woman are married, then marriage has absolutely nothing to do with parenthood anymore. Is that really what we want to say? Why are there perks and priviledges attached to marriage in the first place? Because by its nature it tends towards expensive dependents!
Yet here we are buying claims that it is "unfair and unjust" to deny the perks of marriage to people whose relationship simply isn't oriented towards the actions that those perks were designed to reward!
We've gone insane as a society. This is one small step away from a lawsuit claiming discrimination by a man who wants to be declared a mother.