Abortionists are Marytrs: Sin and Salvation


Right, well…I know this title might be a little inflammatory, but I really wasn’t sure how to name it. I’m looking more to gage reactions to the statement if anything to what (to me) was a very interesting, if macabre jump in logic given from a child in a non-Catholic bibleclass I was observing (for research purposes). I’d be very grateful to hear the Catholic response.

The topic begins on the premise of why in the Old Testament God appears to be so bloodthirsty, with demands ranging from human sacrifice (Judges 11:29-40) to the large number of orders for the slaying of men women and children (Exodus 11:5). It was an interesting question to watch them try to respond to, one they admittedly struggled with.

The best conclusion they reached, eventually having to be led to it by the tutor was that anything God does (including killing) is good, but the key reason for why it was good was that by killing them before they were capable of consciously sinning, they would be basically “fast tracked” to Heaven.

Then comes the problem. One girl then prompted the question “If that’s the case, isn’t the guy who kills babies is doing the kindest and most merciful thing a human can do? He’ll go to hell but he could send thousands of people to heaven, especially if he baptizes then kills them straight away”.

…Yeah, I know I certainly raised a brow hearing this from a 14 year old girl and the teacher didn’t really have any response. I decided then to step in and provide a rather more ambiguous “Ends never justify the means” response that seemed to placate her but…I have been mulling over the question myself, looking at a few different denominations perspectives.

If the goal of Catholics (or all Christians) is to not sin, isn’t letting children into the world to inevitably sin a terrible crime? However bizarre and twisted it seems, that would seem to be a reasonable conclusion within the framework of the nature of original sin.

Your response to the girl was correct. The ends do not justify the means. Even if we murder for a supposedly good purpose, we still commit one of the gravest mortal sins out there.

Also, I believe the term “abortionist” refers to the one performing the abortion, not the baby killed by him.

It is? Oh…Good, thank you. I wasn’t quite sure what word to use to denote specifically a baby killer.

I don’t think anyone disagrees, even the girl that murder is a great sin. I think what he point was that the murderer is guilty of a grave sin, but the baby is immediately sent to heaven if killed immediate after Baptism.

Her logic appeared to be that while the killer might suffer eternal damnation, all his victims benefit from the crime. He would be in a sense suffering for their salvation.

God intends for us to live out our lives, otherwise he would not allow us to be born. While their own personal salvation may come out positively, by killing the child the murderer is stifling the potential for every future interaction of their life. Perhaps God had intended that the child become the next St. Francis of Assisi, and through the example of their life lead to the conversion of thousands of souls. By killing that child before they are able to fulfill that purpose, what becomes of the souls which did not receive God’s graces through the child? In addition to this, what of the future lineage of the child? If they were to have children, who have children, who have more children, until the end of time. What of the thousands of souls who never came into existence because of the actions of that one murderer?

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.