Admin talked jobs with Romanoff

Administration officials dangled the possibility of a job for former Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff last year in hopes he would forego a challenge to Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet, his rival in an Aug. 10 primary, administration officials said Wednesday.

These officials declined to specify the job that was floated or the name of the administration official who approached Romanoff, and said no formal offer was ever made. They spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they were not cleared to discuss private conversations…

Unlike Sestak, Romanoff has ducked questions on the subject, and it was not clear how long his discussions with administration officials lasted.

There seems to be a pattern of behavior here. I would say it is grounds for an independent investigator.

And Blagojevich is being prosecuted for what, now?

Here we go again. Is this a pattern of behavior that is emerging? :rolleyes:

"AP Sources: Admin talked jobs with Romanoff

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration dangled the possibility of a government job for former Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff last year in hopes he would forgo a challenge to Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet, officials said Wednesday, just days after the White House admitted orchestrating a job offer in the Pennsylvania Senate race.:...

Entire article here:

"Romanoff confirms White House job discussions

U.S. Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff said publicly for the first time Wednesday that a White House deputy discussed three specific jobs that “might be available” if Romanoff dropped a primary challenge to a fellow Democrat, Sen. Michael Bennet."…

Entire article here:

Er…did Robert Gibbs just admit that the WH tried to buy off Romanoff? That’s an impeachable offense.…

Taken together, the Sestak and Romanoff cases suggest a White House team that is one part Dick Daley, one part Barney Fife.

They undercut the Obama’s reputation on two fronts. Trying to put the fix in to deny
Democratic voters the chance to choose for themselves who their Senate nominees should be is hardly consistent with the idea of “Yes we can” grassroots empowerment that is central to Obama’s brand.

And bungling that fix is at odds with the Obama team’s image—built around the likes of Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, David Plouffe and Obama himself—as shrewd political operatives who know the game and always win it.

Another article to read.

"White House faces a second job offer controversy

The White House on Thursday confirmed it tried to coax a second candidate out of a Democratic Senate primary race, this time saying it discussed the possibility of three USAID jobs with Andrew Romanoff, who is running against an administration-favored incumbent in Colorado."…

Entire article here:


Was it Bill? Or Hillary this time??

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit