The thing I find interesting is two things that Van Dalen talked about, and I’ll quote:
Van Dalen said gays were feeling increasingly uncomfortable in public in recent years, and that they perceived Dutch society as more assertive about "classical values
“Our objective is not to be offensive. This is about visibility," he said. (Van Dalen)
Frank van Dalen, chairman of Pro Gay, which organized the event, said gays were not satisfied with being tolerated, but wanted to be “socially accepted as an indivisible part of society.”
The reports of violence are troubling. They should not be physically attacked. That is not a proper Christian response or secular response. :nope:
It seems that the more “visible” gays become in Amsterdam the more animosity against them. So, it seems Van Dalen’s approach is counter-productive. They want to be more open, but complain that when they are more open in public they are both more uncomfortable and more harassed.
And instead of trying to integrate with the rest of society and not to be just “tolerated”, they put on this kind of mockery of what the rest of society holds dear. Shouldn’t they be more for educating the public and conforming, rather than forcing the issue down the throats of their fellow citizens?
Does anyone else see the bad logic, or is it just me?