Look up The Great Mars Hill Resurrection Debate (2012) (PDF) by Robert Greg Cavin and Carlos A. Colombetti (infidels.org)
I honestly believe its a joke. Poor research and so many holes in it that you can sink a boat underwater! IF this is the best they can do...yikes!
I put this in no particular order:
2nd law of Thermodynamics? They believe God COULD NOT break this law to resurrect Jesus! (Putting limits on an all powerful God did they?) Their explanation is very bizarre.
God can't enter a closed universe? They didn't even define him as transcendent in their argument! They set up a straw god they can easily refute! They do not mention God transcending from Space Time and existing outside of time! Pg 295 is good for laughs!
They show ignorance of the Gospel narratives...not understanding why they were written differently to begin with (Especially Mark and Luke)
They talk about mathematics like Bayes theorem...when you see a equation were B=our background information in the anti Bayes theorem...keep in mind that their variables in the equation come from their faulty research. Don't be surprised if the math agrees with them...I am not a expert on Bayes or Anti-Bayes theorem...but I have great suspicion.
A Catholic expert can refute all 400 pages in a sitting...
I'm asking the Catholic Experts!