Ok, so this atheist boy I’m debating with insists that subatomic particles do not need a cause and effect. So it shows the kalam cosmological argument to be false. He also claims and I quote “a giant quantum vacuum fluctuatiom. You might believe that this would result in a violation of the conservation of energy law, but it doesn’t. Particles with energy can come from nothing at the subatomic level due to the lack of relationship between cause and effect BUT the more energy the particle has, the shorter it lasts in order to satisfy the law of conservation, and the less energy it has, the longer it can last. You are probably under the impression that this universe has an enormous amount of energy, aand that it could only last for a extremely short time if it came from nothing. However, this is not true. This universe has an entire global net energy of zero. This is because gravity is a negative energy. And the matter which generates the gravity is positive energy. This would mean that this universe has a total net energy of zero. And the fact that this universe has 0 energy is empirical proof that it came from nothing as a vacuum fluctuation without violating any conservational.”
**Physicists and apologists please help!!!