Another “prince of the church” is disgraced. I am aware that the use of “Prince” is not normally associated with Cardinals these days but the definition still states “Cardinal or Bishop”. I used small “p” to make this point. Of course it is just pure coincidence that Bransfield is closely associated with McCarrick. Just like the majority problem facing the church abuse problem is clerical and not homosexual in nature.
And what is with all these bishops and their Jersey shore houses used for their immoral purposes? Maybe a good 1st step would be to find out who else has them?