When people make claims like this, do they not see the implications and logical conclusions?
Scripture is one conduit or stream in the larger body of apostolic tradition in the life of the church.
Look at the fruit and irony of pitting one of Holy tradition against another. Everyone claims one source but no one can agree on the interpretation, and that’s supposed to be proof of the unity of the body of Christ.
If the bible is against Catholic tradition I find it insane that the bishops who selected books for the Cannon would include books that sharply condemn the very traditions and practices they believed in at the very same time these books were approved! Why would they incriminate themselves and the church so carelessly?
If the real presence, prayers for the dead, the Eucharist, etc are all to be compared with Jesus’ condemnation of the pharisees with their traditions of men - and the protestant reading of anti catholic proof texts is correct - you would think the bishops would have had enough sense to either remove a bunch of books and even verses here and there, seeing that Christians in their own time, and those of later generations, would so easily prove them heretics.