I want to present my reasoning for the Pro-Life arguement. I want someone to either challenge it, or tell me what they think
Science verify's that Life begins at the moment of conception.
So when we say "It's the Mothers choice, we give her the right to kill an unborn human being"
You have just subjected the value of life, which begs the question
"What makes your life or mine anymore valuable than an unborn Childs, if life is as subjective as you have made it, instead of an objective fact?"
You say " we are more developed". Hitler would have been proud of you. He also said that the "Jews, Gypsies, Homosexuals, Catholics etc." were not as developed either, however does this excuse his crime? any genocide in history has always begun with the value and Sacredness of human life becoming a subjective value, instead of remaing the objective value it HAS to remain.
"Fetus" when used by professional scientists, is a term meaning a stage of life. Just as teens are professionally called Adolescents, Grown-ups "Adults", etc. The term "Fetus" does not denote the value or instance of Life in the Mother. Its a mere scientific term used for a LIFE stage. (Key word there being LIFE)
I cannot kill anyone for "choice". Neither should a MOTHER be allowed to do the same.
You sir, have subjected the value of life, given me no solid refuatations, and have clearly lost this debate.