Capital Punishment - impermissable: a parallel viewpoint


Elie Wiesel (Nobel Peace Prize winner, Jewish) explored this topic emotionally and philosophically in a short work entitled Dawn, the second in a trilogy. This piece is a work of fiction.

He asks “how can we break the cycle of violence…does murder call for murder…?”

The book is told in the first person and his character ends up executing a captive, in retribution for a string of murders. But, before that happens, one of the climactic quandries he confronts is what he will become if he executes the hostage. He spends an almost sleepless night before it happens. Part of what pushes him over the line to do the execution was that he (fictionally) was chosen for just this purpose.

It sort of kicks the can down the road and leads implicitly to the question of conscientious objection.


Moderator closing thread in 3-2-1…


Why was he chosen just for that purpose?




Moderator has declared a moratorium on this subject. For info, please refer to the article



Hmm, I don’t see how this is inappropriate.

The scenario guy recommends book doesn’t seem controversial.

He’s not saying ‘let’s trash the Holy Father for changing the Catechism’ or anything.

There’ve been enough of those threads…


DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit