Originally Posted by ProdglArchitect
I’ll lay ten to one odds that no other network picks this story up.
I would be surprised if other networks picked this up because it is a very local story and a very small one…most editors would say a woman mouthing off for a few minutes and kicking two signs isn’t enough to warrant a “story”.
If it’s a slow news day and they have to fill a slot, maybe.
Plus, she just seems like an imbalanced person walking by for a few minutes. I don’t think the camera guy she pushed to stop filming her got hurt. Had he or anyone else got hurt, it would be another level of story and it would be reported on more.
But if other networks don’t pick it up, tho…it’s not because it’s a pro-life demonstration. It’s because nothing big happened.
Any journalism teacher would say this and teach this.
Originally Posted by DeniseNY
Liberals are very much for diversity of thought and freedom of expression… unless, of course, you disagree with them.
How do we know she’s a “Liberal”?
We can barely tell what she’s saying. She’s saying something about “women’s rights” but nothing else is clear from the video…we can’t tell what, exactly, she’s angry about.
Even if she’s against their protest and thinks they are “idiots”, as she said in the later interview, we still don’t know why exactly. There might be something about this specific group that she is ticked off about.
And even if she’s legally pro-choice, it still doesn’t mean you can generalize and categorize her as a “Liberal”…and then go a step further, even, and make that generalization of all “Liberals”.
I mean…you can, of course. But you have a 50-50 chance of being correct.
Any man or woman who could kill their own child or encourage someone else to is imbalanced.
And also a liberal. Let’s not be coy about this…
Posted from Catholic.com App for Android