Thanks! I put it together in MS Paint (so high tech, I know;)) You are welcome to take it and use it anywhere you like.
I do wonder if it is a specific headcount or more than just that GLAAD is wanting. I see more “married” gays adopting children in entertainment media than I used to see. I think that is step 2. Step 1 was to take the shock value away from gayness, which I would say has been very successful. I know I have been de-sensatised to it. It is no longer a shocking plot twist to find out someone is gay. The shock is gone, the closet is destroyed.
Step 2 is to make gay familes/relationships also appear normal, if not superior to heterosexual families. It is this type of coverage I am seeing more and more now on television. Generally script writers do not have them vocally defend their lifestyle. It is the job of heterosexual characters to brand other people as biggots, so as not to make the gay characters seem militant. I don’t know if it is life immitating “art” or the other way around, but I find that model to be true to form. The gay people I interact with are usually not making a huge deal about it, it will be some straight gay rights advocate that does all that.
Anyway, there is a gay agenda, it just might not be something being run by actual gays. Curious situation.