3:44 This is an account of things [about Mary’s childhood] beyond your knowledge that We [Allah] revealed to you [Muhammad]: you were not present . . .
In effect, Muhammad says, “I wasn’t there, so believe that I got these events in Mary’s life from Allah! I did not get these info from human sources, so don’t come along after me and research my claims!”
But what is reality? that these accounts were **already **written in apocryphic gospels and Muhammad did **NOT **need to be present at all; he only needed to read or listen to these passages In other words, Allah’s “reason” is wrong. He, supposedly an all-knowing, must have known that people already wrote these thing and Muhammad did not need to be present hundreds of years before to know about these ficticious accounts.
As to Muhammad’s challenge about bringing a sura/passage like it, let’s read this :
19:29-31 The people said, “How shall we talk with him, who is but an infant in the cradle?” Whereupon the child spoke out, "I am a servant of Allah: He has given me the Book and He has appointed me a Prophet, and He has made me blessed wherever I may be. He has enjoined upon me to offer Salat and give Zakat so long as I shall live.
Jesus spake when He was in the cradle, and said to Mary His Mother, “Verily I am Jesus, the Son of God, the Word which thou hast borne, according as the angel Gabriel gave thee the good news; and My Father hath sent Me for the salvation of the world.”
the apocryphal Arabic Infancy Gospel
Muhammad surely transformed Jesus into a muslim baby by chanfing some words, but notice the similarity in style and phrase sequence between the 2 passages thus i believe the apocryphic passage written in some apocrypha matches Allah’s style in the Quran which means it met the challenge (1) and (2) proved Allah’s reasoning as wrong since Muhammad did not need to live at Mary’s time to hear this fiction.