I found this commentary very much trying to bring questions and doubts to ones faith.It seemed to suggest human motives from the authors rather then it being the inspiration of GOD.
Here are just some things that have really bothered me.
It states that the Gospel of John most likely wasnt written by John.
It states that a few Chapters including Chapter 21 was added sometime later then 90 ad.
In the Gospel of Luke it points out the Contradiction of the Women who saw Jesus and ran and told the apostles and Marks Gospel who says they didnt say anything.
How do we as Christians answer this contradiction , and also what are some other contradictions and how do we answer those?
Also in John 1:1 it interpets the verse like this.
Was God: lack of definite article with ‘‘God’’ in greek signifies predication rather then identification.
is not this commentary casting doubts that Jesus Was God?
There is a few other things ive noticed but being i just bought this Bible yesterday Im sure there’s a whole bunch of commentarys ill be perplexed over.
Can someone who has a true knowledge of this topic answer these questions for me, its somewhat hurt my faith .I tried to post this to one of the apologists but it wouldnt post for some reason.