I’m writing this with the utmost respect, but you’re seriously misconstruing my words. I am not now nor have I said the “Church is now wrong.”
I have REPEATEDLY AND CONTINUOUSLY written that communion in the hand is authorised and lawful.
This is my point: I witnessed the theft of a consecrated host. I then researched the liturgical norms. I found - to my surprise - that Rome DID NOT WANT communion in the hand. I verified this by actually reading the documents. Rome CAPITULATED and created an EXCEPTION to the law.
Here is my issue: THE EXCEPTION BECAME THE NORM and my nephew was refused communion on the tongue at his first communion.
MANY PEOPLE ON THIS THREAD HAVE READ MEANINGS INTO MY WORDS WITHOUT ACTUALLY READING WHAT I WROTE.
I’m not judging anybody. I SHARED INFORMATION I FOUND during my research. Nothing more and nothing less.
Onewoman: this post isn’t so much directed to you as to everybody else who have placed words in my mouth and misinterpreted my words.