Concern for Those Who Screen the Web for Barbarity

NY Times:

Concern for Those Who Screen the Web for Barbarity

Ricky Bess spends eight hours a day in front of a computer near Orlando, Fla., viewing some of the worst depravities harbored on the Internet. He has seen photographs of graphic gang killings, animal abuse and twisted forms of pornography. One recent sighting was a photo of two teenage boys gleefully pointing guns at another boy, who is crying.
An Internet content reviewer, Mr. Bess sifts through photographs that people upload to a big social networking site and keeps the illicit material — and there is plenty of it — from being posted. His is an obscure job that is repeated thousands of times over, from office parks in suburban Florida to outsourcing hubs like the Philippines.
The surge in Internet screening services has brought a growing awareness that the jobs can have mental health consequences for the reviewers, some of whom are drawn to the low-paying work by the simple prospect of making money while looking at pornography.

. . .

Internet companies are reluctant to discuss the particulars of content moderation, since they would rather not draw attention to the unpleasantness that their sites can attract. But people in the outsourcing industry say tech giants like Microsoft, Yahoo and MySpace, a division of the News Corporation, all outsource some amount of content review.
YouTube, a division of Google, is an exception. If a user indicates a video is inappropriate, software scans the image looking for warning signs of clips that are breaking the site’s rules or the law. Flagged videos are then sent for manual review by YouTube-employed content moderators who, because of the nature of the work, are given only yearlong contracts and access to counseling services, according to Victoria Grand, a YouTube spokeswoman.

I can’t imagine the mental/spiritual damage of doing a job like this.

I would think that it would be a heavy burden.

We routinely offer counseling to emergency services workers who have witnessed gruesome situations. And counseling to the general public, whether in schools or the workplace, who have endured a traumatic event. But such internet reviewers are working without that support.

What springs to mind is the movie A Clockwork Orange, and the violent images the main character is forced to endure. The internet screeners have no idea of what or when they will be subjected to horrific images or for how often. Of course, in the case of the internet screeners, they can walk away from their livelihood. But that isn’t always the right thing to do - sometimes the emotional damage sneaks up on someone. We often see that with PTSD.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit