Dalmanutha, Biblical Town Mentioned In Gospel Of Mark, Possibly Discovered Archaeologists Claim

Very cool:

Dalmanutha, a Biblical town described in the Gospel of Mark as the place where Jesus sailed after miraculously multiplying a few loaves and fish to feed 4,000 people, may have just been discovered by archaeologists, reports LiveScience.

*So they did eat, and were filled: and they took up of the broken meat that was left seven baskets.
And they that had eaten were about four thousand: and he sent them away.

And straightway he entered into a ship with his disciples, and came into the parts of Dalmanutha.

-Mark 8:8-8:10, King James Version*

Dalmanutha is only mentioned in Mark’s Gospel, but the corresponding passage in Matthew 15:39 says, “And he sent away the multitude, and took ship, and came into the coasts of Magdala,” which has been identified with some certainty as the modern-day town of Migdal, located slightly inland near Israel’s Ginosar Valley. Magdala is perhaps most well-known for its association with Mary Magdalene, or Mary of Magdala, who may have been born in the town.

Fields between today’s Migdal and the coast are rich with archaeological discoveries, reports Ken Dark of the U.K.'s University of Reading, whose team discovered the town they are proposing is Dalmanutha while conducting a field survey. They have linked it with the 1986 discovery of a 2,000-year-old boat which was found on the shoreline, and to date is the most famous artifact associated with the specific area.

“Vessel glass and amphora hint at wealth,” wrote Dark in the most recent edition of Palestine Exploration Quarterly, and “eights and stone anchors, along with the access to beaches suitable for landing boats — and, of course, the first-century boat … all imply an involvement with fishing.”

The findings indicate that the town was prosperous and likely survived for centuries, as the pottery pieces date from as early as the second or first century BCE to around fifth century CE, the time of the Byzantine Empire. A Jewish community likely lived alongside a polytheistic one as tesserae cubes and limestone vessel fragments, “associated with Jewish purity practices in the early Roman period” have been found, Dark told LiveScience.

Modern-day Migdal has also been a cornucopia of ancient finds, some of which were discovered out in the open, repurposed by the current residents. Some architectural remains had been turned into seats or garden ornaments, and over 40 basalt ashlar blocks were found in a single garden.

Though Dark is not certain that the newly uncovered town is the Biblical Dalmanutha, the size of the town supports that identification. Dalmanutha is one of a few place-names known by researchers to relate to the Ginosar Valley shore, that is not already linked to an archaeological site.




Awesome, thanks for sharing!


Nice, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. :cool:

There are several Decapolis cities also waiting to be discovered on the east side of the Sea of Galilee.

Anywhere around the Sea of Galilee, dig down thirty feet away from shore and you’ll probably find something.

It is only natural that if anything ancient IS found, to link it to something biblical. That means publicity and easier funding for future projects.

This is only tangentially related to the topic but I thought may be of interest to those who are interested in the topic.

A visionary named Maria Valtorta claimed a private revelation about the life of Jesus (similar to the Gospels but far more detailed). In her visions, she named several towns, and 9 of those towns were discovered after her death:

Please note however, if you’re not familiar with Valtorta, that there is some controversy about whether her visions were genuine or not, and my understanding is that its status is non constat de supernaturalitate (not proven to be supernatural; i.e. neutral). I apologize if it’s not appropriate to post about them.

Is there a reason in your view why an ancient city would not have been named in the Bible?

The entire east side of the Gennesareth was Greek Syrian predominantly. The towns there were set apart from Jewish territory and called the Decapolis by Pompey, so they did not have to under a Jewish theocracy.

No particular reason for the NT to mention them.

The Roman authority of appeal was the President of Syria, as the former territory of Herod Philip reverted to Roman authority after Philip’s death.

When Jesus thought Antipas was after him, after Antipas had executed JB, he lived in eastern Galilee area, or just a stone’s throw away in Capernaum, which was close to the Syrian-controlled territory.

“Is there a reason in your view why an ancient city would not have been named in the Bible?”

Not every city had Bible stuff happen in it. Even if Biblical personages lived there, and it was very close to where Biblical stuff did happen, there were plenty of good-sized cities and towns in the general vicinity there.

Because it’s not important to the plot?

Sepphoris, Qumran, Masada, Yodfat (Jotapata), Gamala, the fortress of Machaerus, the Herodium, Giv’at ha-Mivtar, Ein Gedi, Naḥal Ḥever, Gischala, Scythopolis (Beth-Shean), Hippos, Pella, Capitolias, Canatha, Raphana, the Decapolitan Philadelphia, Hyrcania, Acrabetta, Sebaste - most or all of these sites are not named in the NT, but many of them are historically or archaeologically important places for 1st-2nd century Jewish history. Sephoris in fact was close to Nazareth (a site which for the 1st century is attested only in the gospels!) but we don’t hear about this city in the gospels at all.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.