The theory of evolution is called “a theory” and not a scientific law.
The theory of evolution was not subjected to the scientific method so is not “scientific” per se. It It has never made any prediction which might be verified, other than suggesting in the first edition of Origin that a bear might evolve into a whale like creature 1, but that suggestion was quickly removed from the second edition. Neo-Darwinists have long promised a missing link but only fakes have ever emerged.
Darwin’s “theory” is more of a hypothesis, which remains “not-proven” because the Neo-Darwinist theory of evolution states that the complete diversity of life today arose from a single common ancestor which developed from a primordial chemical soup billions of years ago, when no-one was on earth to observe and record it. Nor has anyone ever seen one species change into another.
Genetic homeostasis 1 (I.M. Lerner) is a testable law which overwhelmingly speaks against Darwinist evolution from one species into another.
Nothing from ancient pre-history is observable, repeatable, nor can it be measured.
Darwinism is non observable, so is simply not falsifiable, thus as an explanation for the start of life on earth (abiogenesis), Evolution is not a scientific law, nor a scientific theory, nor a scientific thesis; it is nothing more than a flimsy hypothesis, but which has now become a man-made proto-religion.
So why is it taught as a science using public funds?