Archaeologists, or are they paleontologists–natural scientists–have been going left well before the '60s.
If going left means following the evidence, they have been doing so for much longer than that. And it is paleontologists we are speaking of. The fact that you don’t know says a lot.
Just take the Fr. Merrin character from the Exorcist: The Beginning movie. His character was probably based upon the laicized Teilhard deChardin, though the latter didn’t quite go agnostic. These natural scientists look for ways to take God out of the picture. It’s not unlike how we have a premise (a dogma) upon which truth is exegeted, though our premises are obviously divine in origin. God not being the creator is a premise upon which the laws of nature get sidelined in public schools; dogma can have laws of nature being bent because God can bend them, but not in the ways macroevolution believers would have it.
So because some people use the evidence to justify their (lack of) beliefs, the evidence is false? Many civilizations have worshipped the sun as a god. Does that mean, using your logic, that the sun doesn’t exist?
Macroevolution what Mao had taught first in the schools of his government. Why? Do I really have to state it? This indoctrination of a doctrine of hate (as people are no more than fancy animals, according to those who fashioned it) is alive and well in public schools and, sadly, so many Christians, even high in rank, have taken the bait. It’s interesting it’s not a dogma. Maybe God is protecting it from this pernicious lie sugarcoated by Christians with a fable of God directing the false evolution of species. Satan is the only liar of the two and God does not endorse his lies, but lets us believe them as a punishment for our sins.
Evolution is a scientific theory, not a lie from Satan. You can go on believing that science is evil, but it is not. It is a wonderful gift from God that way too many on this forum denigrate and deny. What a shame.
We are not anti-science; the Commies are.
Yes, you are.
Why is it that not approving of macroevolution (and embryonic stem cell research gets tacked on as well by the liberals, as their lies are what they want us to believe are scientific) is being afraid of science, when science has unravelled Darwin’s theory and understood macroevolution as impossible?
Interesting that you make a claim like that when it is demonstrably false.
Like those who followed the majority of doctors who went wild with labotomies and seeing the mentally challenged as “useless eaters”, you’re free to follow the majority of “experts”. Reason sees it’s bunk, because there are experts, who are no less experts in the field, who have thought this out critically as scientists and converted to ID or even creationism.
Let me ask you, foolishmortal, is evolution the root of all evil?
If the Catholic Church would close the book on this, it’s called religion. That’s what ours is. Science is not that. It has no infallible teachings and its leaders don’t seem to care objectivity, as Piltdown Man was praised for years before being discovered as a hoax. We’re tired of this dictatorship of thought.
Then do something about it. If science has so clearly shown macroevolution to be false and you hear of a biology teacher teaching that it is true (go to any university and you will find plenty of them), file a lawsuit to stop them from intentionally lying to advance a religious belief. Otherwise, you are a willing participant in “this dictatorship of though”.