Vonsalza in post 1783 (emphasis mine) . . . .
Cathoholic was invalid above because his argument REQUIRES “they want to make guns less available” and “they’ll come and get your guns” to mean the same thing.
For people who want facts, here is what I REALLY said . . . .
(Cathoholic in post 1780)
I do not want to go into your homes and get them (your fire arms).
HOW do you plan on getting them?
Vonsalza’s answer as to HOW Vonsalza will obtain (“grab”) free law-abiding people’s firearms (in post 1782) . . .
Because I support voluntary buybacks . . . .
This is the kind of non-sequiturs we get from people who think like this.
Vonsalza. WHAT if someone doesn’t “voluntarily” “sell” their firearm “back” to the Government (who never owned it in the first place)?
Over time, a lot of the loose guns will get sucked up . . .
They’ve had “voluntary” buy “backs” in Chicago.
How’s THAT working Vonsalza?
(Vonsalza will just reply to Nationalize this. Double-down on yet more failed Government programs.–The usual answer likely)
Vonsalza goes on:
the loose guns will get sucked up; particularly when the next recession hits.
There you have it folks.
Not just an attack on good, honest, hard-working, law-abiding citizens, but FOCUSED on . . . .
. . . . POOR, good, honest, hard-working, law-abiding citizens.
The POOR woman who has an out of control restraining-order-ignoring “ex” is the first to be TARGETED by people like Vonsalza.
And all the worse for her if she has a liitle baby or two that she is ALSO trying to help and defend.
And if she is fighting breast cancer, or has some other health ailment?
Let the “buy backs” begin!
Take advantage of her misery.
THAT is the Vonsalza paradigm here.
As I said before. The first elitist was satan (in my opinion).
“I will NOT SERVE” (those of lower stature than me)!!