the so-called Democracy for All Amendment goes much further than nullifying one Supreme Court decision. It would radically rewrite the constitutional treatment of political speech, allowing Congress and state legislatures to impose any restrictions on election-related spending they consider reasonable.
So what? Congress isn’t needed to amend or not amend the Constitution.
And yet, people here will say that unions and corporations support the Democrat party too. Unions and corporations who benefit the most from Citizens United v. FEC. Which came to light because of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
Nice thought. Not necessary. Won’t happen.
Actually, it isn’t really a nice thought.
This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.