But yet, some do understand it and they say “baloney!” to the natural selection people. Some say there’s priests who believe it and there are many other scientists who believe in macroevolution. So what? The whole world, including high clerics in The Church, believed the Earth was flat, and that was when there wdere accurate star patterns being made. The few to deny it would go through ridicule and get kicked off any occupation of influence over others. If most clergy are living like the world, like it seemed to be in St. Francis’s time, then does that make their personal beliefs credible? Reliability only matters when truth and integrity are used. I don’t know the Pope’s scientists’ souls, but it’s obvious massive holes are being missed and they are being exposed by other clerics and non-Catholics, as well. I don’t think the dissenting opinion clerics were invited to the discussion they had. Interesting.
Two of the Pharisees had to be secret followers or sympathizers of Jesus. BTW You ever notice they say you can’t mix religion and science, but theistic evolutionists are not booed off–just tolerated. It’s ok, because they are helping them debunk the literal interpretation of the Bible for another religiously-held worldview that is full of holes. Why? It’s propaganda for the Masonics. It’s a turf war declared against the Catholic Church by its ancient counterculture opponents, who will probably consider theistic evolutionists, unnecessary at some point as “feeble-minded” for believing in God.
People like Dawkins (we come from alien seed…i.e., from any being, but God) and Myers (the ringleader for Eucharistic sacrileges) in “Expelled” need to be the ones kicked out of academia and censored in any serious field of science by sincere believers in macroevolution. They clearly show a conflict of interest and so do those who don’t shut them up. It won’t happen that they’ll be shut up, though. Those macroevolutionists in charge are running things in academia and science and so they have dropped their pretensions. Have you ever heard of scientific-communism? Think of people as just the highest animals, without a soul, and you have vulnerable specimens to experiment upon. Those who are not productive or useful can be singled-out for extermination. Have we not learned, just because the ones exterminated cannot be seen walking about the streets? Are we going to let these bullies use their religion (which has made icons, like the Darwin fish and the ape handing a skeleton a stick) to go from the most defenseless to those they dislike over a farce of a theory? Do we need to repeat history for a theory full of holes? Ben Stein thinks not. Neither do I.