Four Big Holes in Peter Strzok's 'Evidence' of His Election Neutrality |


#1

There can be no question of bias.
He must think Americans are stupid.


#2

It’s odd how the headline and article are so disjoint.
What is the evidence that Strzok’s political preference led to bias in his performance of his duties?


#3

There isn’t. But that doesn’t matter - they just need a talking point to deflect onto.


#4

There is a strange lack of concern from those on the right about the NY FBI office leaking like a sieve during the campaign though.


#5

Was there too much information in the
article to grasp?


#6

Not at all. Why do you ask?


#7

You don’t see the evidence?


#8

The evidence against Strzok?
Look again. Strzok is discussed in the opening of the article. But not in any of the evidence - the four big holes - paragraphs. That is the disjunction that I mentioned i n post #2L the "evidence was oblique to the claim.


#9

Agent Strzok worked for the FBI. He was on the inside - in the loop.

Everyone working under the impression
President Trump would never win.

The act he put on in the hearing the other day was not convincing.


#10

He does and he is not wrong.


#11

Did he act as though he thought Trump woudl win? :confused:


#12

WIFI has been out due to bad electrical storms. I will have to reply tomorrow.


#13

This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.


DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.