God's Hiddenness, God's love, and the Witness of Scripture


Though I have some odd bedfellows, I’ve remained a committed evangelical Christian for ten years. Within my tradition the inspiration and inerrancy of scripture tends to go hand in hand with the truth of the faith. Recently, I’ve been troubled to find that those who seem to be best acquainted with the original languages, and the historicity of scripture, don’t have a problem with what they find to be irreconcilable historical differences between certain accounts in the gospels.

Michael Licona, for example, in his book “Why Are There Differences in the Gospels?” explains these differences by establishing that most if not all of the Gospels belong to the genre of Greco-Roman biography and that this genre permitted some flexibility in the way in which historical events were narrated.

That’s all well and good, so far as understanding the nature of the genre of scripture employed in revealing God in the person of Christ. The problem I have is this: why would God use a genre to communicate something as vital as a saving knowledge of Himself in Christ that permits flexibility in the way in which those historical events were narrated? Why not perfect cohesion, while still maintaining a unique voice through each human author? Could God not have provided a scriptural revelation of Himself and the Gospel via a means that would have produced less stumbling blocks than the genre of Greco-Roman biography? He did at one time communicate in the writing of his own power on tablets of stone, why not more of that?

The issue I have is that if I were to read something God-breathed, and the God who breathed it was good and compassionate and was not willing that any should perish, then why would He seemingly hide Himself behind writings that could be justifiably questioned as a reliable witness?

To be clear, my problem isn’t whether or not the scriptures are generally historically reliable, I think that could be established. My problem is that huge books have had to be written to establish it, and that seems to fly in the face of a loving God that wants to be known, and desires all to come to a saving faith.

Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.


I think you hit the nail on the head here. If we really think it through to it’s logical extent, it doesn’t make sense that God would hide himself within our understanding of the Bible.

I would say go back and read the Gospels and ask the question how did Jesus intend for us to learn and understand the faith? If you read carefully He never wrote anything down nor did He ever command His Apostles to write down what He said. He command them to teach.

Matthew 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit

Jesus never intended to hide himself behind writings. He established a Church with the authority to teach what He taught them. He established a Church to be a light to the world. He never once says He will establish a Bible that will be a light to the world.

Not trying to be preachy but that is one off the problems we can run into if we present the Bible as everything adn the only thing Jesus intended for the faithful. People love to pick and choose through what they read and say see gotcha, even when what they pick out isn’t really the context of what the writer is trying to present.

Maybe this article will help…


God Bless

closed #3

This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.