Gohmert: Watchdog Found Clinton Emails Were Sent To ‘Foreign Entity’


This is interesting…



A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

“Mr. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call,” Gohmert said.

The ICIG previously caught problems regarding Clinton’s server that the FBI missed. The bureau didn’t notice that some emails were openly marked classified with a “©” when they were sent. (RELATED: FBI Missed Clinton Emails Openly MARKED Classified, Wanted To Conclude Probe Before IG Caught Mistake)

The ICIG spotted the oversight after the FBI missed it, texts between Strzok and his mistress, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, show. . . .

If an American insider did this, . . . This suggests treason!



One of the more liberal minded posters suggested paying a visit to Rush Limbaugh (sarcastically earlier today - see my reference to it here).

Naturally I went there almost immediately.


From Rush today concerning the DNC (not DIRECTLY concerning the above but possibly related and concerns Pakistan) . . .

. . . . There’s a record, the metadata. Any time a computer’s hard drive is used, there’s the log kept of what happens, including data transferal or data transformation. CrowdStrike found this; it’s been reported. The speeds of the data that ended up being on WikiLeaks and elsewhere could have only occurred if somebody had plugged a jump drive into a port and transferred the data that way.

There was no way that an outside hacker could have downloaded data on this server as quickly as it was off-loaded. Even the highest network speeds do not have the transfer rates of plugging in a thumb drive or an external drive connected to a port on a computer or a server. But they have maintained that the data was obtained by virtue of offsite hacking, which means somebody using the internet or some other kind of network got in and started transmitting data after stealing it from the DNC server to whoever it was that was hacking.

Well, the transfer speeds that were used could not have occurred. It could not have happened that way. It had to happen with somebody plugging in a thumb drive or an external drive and transferring it over wires. This much is known. That’s why it’s led back to the Awan brothers and what the h*** were they doing. Now, the Democrats don’t want anybody knowing any of this. And that’s why they didn’t want the FBI doing the forensic exam. They wanted it thought that outside hackers, Guccifer 2.0 and some other people with Russian-type identities — which can be faked, by the way.

Don’t forget, the CIA has software that they can hack a computer and make it look like the ChiComs are doing it or the Norks or the Russians. All of those tools were stolen by the way from the CIA by somebody who has now been found. But there are many mysteries behind this, and the DNC knows what they are, didn’t want anybody finding it. I’m so suspicious of these indictments today because how does Mueller find out when the FBI wasn’t even allowed to forensically examine here?


Which just makes it all the more questionable WHY Mueller is IGNORING anyone outside the Donald Trump camp concerning election “hacking” and WHY is Mueller NOT demanding the DNC server for his “investigation”?


It is the preponderance evidence of all of this (the malfeasance, the bias, treating Clintons with kid gloves while pursuing Flynn with the full power of government, etc) that makes many average Americans see how our judicial system treats the political elite differently than the rest of us.


So what really. It is obvious the FBI didn’t care. It is obvious the FBI and Congress still don’t care. Of course Hillary is a crook, but everyone allowing her to go unpunished is too.


This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.