That would belong to the protection the victims. You are getting really desperate to make such ridiculous statements. “Initiating violent actions” is what needs to be protecting against, and the “desire” of the psychopath is irrelevant.
I was hoping that equating a rape with administering a life saving vaccine is beyond your level of irrationality, but I was mistaken. Sheesh!
The funny thing is that you (finally) realized that it is fine to use force against a violent act, but only if the protection is performed by another “moral agent”. And that is your nonsense. If we could build a “robotic system”, which could detect an impending violent act (like a rape) and the system could “zap” the perpetrator-to-be with a directed stun-gun, that would be the proper way to do. Even though the robot is NOT a moral agent. If a “benevolent god” could do the same, that would be the proper way to go.
If we could perform a simple operation to re-program the psychopath and make him to become a benevolent person, that would be the proper way to go. You have this ridiculous fixation that being able to perform some gratuitous sociopathic act is “intrinsically valuable”. That to deprive the “psychopath-to-be” of this ability somehow creates “more evil”. Get real.