Internet Backlash Stalls Jersey Civility Bill (Legislating Internet Manners)


#1

All right. Here it is, folks. The type of government action that tries to make the Internet just another outlet for political correctness and nicety. Now we’re legislating good posting manners, and forcing hosts to reveal your real name.

Does anybody with any kind of a clue still think the government should get into the business of enforcing manners?

Internet Backlash Stalls Jersey Civility Bill
http://i.cmpnet.com/infoweek/spacer.gif
A New Jersey lawmaker’s attempt to legislate civility on an Internet discussion board runs into a wall of opposition from bloggers and others who saw it as an attempt to stifle free speech.
http://i.cmpnet.com/infoweek/spacer.gif
By K.C. Jones

    http://i.cmpnet.com/infoweek/spacer.gif
            Mar 14, 2006 04:04 PM
                         A New Jersey Assemblyman's Internet civility bill is on ice since opponents blasted it as an assault on free speech. 

Assemblyman Peter Biondi and his staff said they were trying to curb malicious exchanges on some local discussion boards when they introduced a bill requiring people to provide their real names and addresses before posting on public Web sites. The bill also stated that hosts could be sued for failing to disclose the identities of people disseminating false or defamatory information.

Biondi’s staff drafted the measure late last year. In was introduced in January. The bill hadn’t even made it to committee before a small weekly newspaper published an article about it and Internet news providers began spreading the word. Then, callers from as far away as Canada deluged Biondi’s office with complaints.

“For a bill that’s basically one of 45 just sitting there to be picked out – and for people in Portland, Oregon and Canadian broadcasters to be calling about it – it’s a little bizarre,” Biondi’s Chief of Staff Scott Ross said during an interview. “For something that’s not even on the radar screen in Trenton, it’s incredible. It’s definitely a first for us. It hit the Drudge Report and it was like 'Holy moly!”

Ross said that Biondi and his staff were responding to requests from local constituents who complained about the viciousness of local discussion boards littered with name-calling. They were shocked that the bill – drafted to bring decorum to Internet discussions – drew an intense response from Internet users far beyond the Garden State’s boundaries.

“We veered out of our comfort zone with this one,” Ross said. “We’re usually open space, quality-of-life kind of guys. We veered into technology and we were pretty much taken off guard when got hit with a couple hundred e-mails last week.”

BuzzMachine blogger and journalist Jeff Jarvis said he is proud to have started the forums that prompted Biondi to introduce the “stupidest legislation in memory.”

Critics said the law would be unconstitutional and impossible to enforce. Ross said he can see things from their perspective, but he still believes people should maintain civility online.

“You could be talking to your neighbor and not even know it,” he said.

Biondi is anticipating a legal opinion from his state legislature’s nonpartisan research division by the end of this week.

The government just loves to tell us how to speak to each other. It would be happy if we would not speak to each other at all except when in direct support of the government.

Alan


#2

[quote=AlanFromWichita]All right. Here it is, folks. The type of government action that tries to make the Internet just another outlet for political correctness and nicety. Now we’re legislating good posting manners, and forcing hosts to reveal your real name.

Does anybody with any kind of a clue still think the government should get into the business of enforcing manners?

The government just loves to tell us how to speak to each other. It would be happy if we would not speak to each other at all except when in direct support of the government.

Alan
[/quote]

The New Jersey’s government’s proposal is questionable in another way: jurisdiction. The Internet does not stop at state or national border. It is international. New Jersey doesn’t have the authority to regulate something that’s international.


#3

Thread closed

Reasons:
Original Post is not linked to a source
Quote in original post should be limited to 1-3 paragraphs


DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.