While the above writer may mot be making many converts with his approach, he does raise doubts about whether gayness has any reality beyond the assertions of individuals to have a “gay” identity. After all, if something doesn’t have a name, what existence does it have? How can we talk about it?
Every heresy in the history of the Church needed a name (often connected with the propagator of the heresy) before it could be denounced.
Are we playing into the hands of heretics by adopting their identity-based language?