As far as I can see there is nothing superior, or even equal, or even worthwhile in the Latin Church. Once so proud it is now a pit of ugliness, stupidity, insipid theology, shallow piety, cowering effeminacy, intellectual vapidity, complete disjunction both from the fathers and even from its previous traditions up until the high middle ages. Its spirituality is aliturgical. It lacks any historical continuity or consistency. Its liturgics, symbology, architecture, iconography, et., etc., etc. are nothing but a confused cacophonous jumble of competing assertions, most of them so disordered as to be indescipherable as a coherent theology by any persons so unfortunate as to be trying to cultivate a true Christian spiritual life in union with the Church that Christ founded and the Apostles, bishops, martyrs, virgins, priests, confessors, and so many others labored and even died to preserve. Posited once by such eminent scholars as Stanley Jaki as having sown the seeds of natural scientific inquiry with its incarnational focus, the Latin Rite is not far and away the LEAST incarnationally focused of all the 22 rites of the Church. Once a Rite thought perhaps overly severe or dour, it is today described as the most 'spirited" or “energetic” or even “immature” of the liturgical practices claiming apostolic descent and authority.
Of course, I’ll give you Latins one thing, you do have Matthew 16:18, so if my observations and studies are correct, and I have seen neither evidence nor cogent argument as to why this is not so, it logical course of action is to blow my brains out rather than go Doxing.
Sorry to be so, as the catamites infesting this board incessantly say, “uncharitable”, but any air of superiority on the part of the Latins can only be due to either ignorance, or the converse, knowledge of their consummate, unmitigated inferiority versus the East.