Love, faith, and reason

When honestly talking religion and reason and how being came into existence, all sides need to be careful, honest, accurate and satisfied with limited results.

The common sense of human knowledge can clearly see that some being or beings structured, organized and regulates the world or universe.

The people of religions must say yes to this. However, we must say that we believe that this being or beings is the God that communicates to us and that He/It/They care for us. We cannot prove that; we believe that.

Modern logic, science, common sense and reasoning must be careful and acknowledge the complexity of the cosmos and agree: some being or beings structured, organized and regulates it.

All sides must admit limits, hopes, and honestly acknowledge: a being or beings made all of this. We cannot prove It/They are the beings of religious worship.
Now, concerning the Jewish and Christian backgrounds, we can demonstrate God’s existence by being His loving agents. God is love and His existence can be demonstrated in loving actions.

What do you mean by “limited results?” Why do you perceive two “sides” between religion and reason? Can a person be *both *religious and reasonable? St. Thomas Aquinas seemed to be both. And he did not settle for a “partial God” (which is what “limited results” implies to me). God either IS, or IS NOT. There is no middle-ground. What do you mean?

God is love and His existence can be demonstrated in loving actions.

That’s not much of a demonstration. Atheists can demonstrate loving actions. One of the best men I know is a foreman for Habitat for Humanity, and is an atheist.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. For official apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.