Phony argument. No one is suggesting that we should not be vetting. We have been vetting and it has been extensive and successful.
As to a national of laws - tell that to CBP who flauted court orders to allow US residents access to legal counsel.
This isn’t just some arbitrary act,done on the fly.We have experienced real acts of terror n this country both on a large and small scale.
Actually it was arbitrary - green cards? no/yes/no - and done on the fly without the usual vetting by State and DoJ, and without proper communication to the enacting officials. This was a joke.
The gov’ts first and highest priority is to protect it’s citizens.
Yes. Better to do smart things well to advance that priority.
President Trump has stated this is a temporary ban until and which time we can be certain these individuals are cleared.
“Certain”? Then it is a permanent ban. Or it is just the circus part of bread and circus.
It has been proven that along with refugees have been a number of people sneaking through that are not well intentioned.
What is the number? What is the number, consistent with “certain”? What is the number consistent with “temporary”?
My husband is a first generation immigrant from Germany,Both he and his parents were vetted,had to have a sponsor and proof of a skill that would provide employment for them once here.This is how it should be.
How does that differ from what we have been doing?