I thought this was “important,” at least in the sense that it is legitimate material to discuss. And the source is from the Tea Party, which i consider a legitimate source. Some may disagree here. :rolleyes:
This is the gist of it in the article and is highlighted in the article itself:
Taking an audacious and shocking angle against the constitutional eligibility mandate, Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.
This quote is also highlighted:
Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate.
You can draw whatever conclusions you want from the article itself-----I personally think there is evidence for this----but some many here may disagree, fo course. Just thought it is worthy of being put here for discussion.
If it somehow breaks any “banned topics” guidelines from CAF, I don’t know about it but the mods are free to remove it, by all means. Alos, if it falls within the “opinion” guideline, (although I personally doubt it) remove it as well.
Read and discuss-----respectfully and charitably, please. Thank you. :D:p